Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040417183711.27202.00000026@mb-m15.aol.com...
> >the C32 isn't around anymore, so there needs to be a new test
>
> You're ignoring the fact that the S4 still would have beaten the M3, no
matter
> which MB was there. And seeing how MB has never built an AMG-tuned C-Class
as good as the M3, I sincerely doubt getting the newer version would have
made a difference. Just admit the fact that the S4 is better than the M3 and
C.

just because ONE mag says it's better no, R & T and MT said it wasn't, so no
it's not a better car in any way but for the AWD.

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

>just because ONE mag says it's better no, R & T and MT said it wasn't

No they didn't. BTW, the C32 is a CURRENT model, so the C&D article was up to
date:
http://www.mbusa.com/brand/models/C32.jsp

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

Tha Ghee wrote:
> no I don't need it do you, does it not work?? did you touch it too much
> when your were young??

a) yes, I need it, if you don't, I'm sorry for you. b) it doesn't wear
out, you can use it as much as you want, c) 'your were young' ?

Where's that spellcheck you advertised? I guess it exists with error
"impossible case"

- Yak

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

"Michael Burman" <yak@iki-fi.invalid> wrote in message
news:c6eqjt$8cqi6$1@midnight.cs.hut.fi...
> Tha Ghee wrote:
> > no I don't need it do you, does it not work?? did you touch it too much
> > when your were young??
>
> a) yes, I need it, if you don't, I'm sorry for you. b) it doesn't wear
> out, you can use it as much as you want, c) 'your were young' ?
>
> Where's that spellcheck you advertised? I guess it exists with error
> "impossible case"
>
> - Yak

are you typing again you're not smart enough to be here stop, find another
debate.

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040424145408.17944.00000291@mb-m06.aol.com...
> >No, if you look at specs on Audi/Por they share a lot of common parts
which
>
> There is not a single part being shared between Audi and Porsche, not ONE.
The closest thing would be the Cayenne, which uses a chassis co-developed by
VW and Porsche for use in the Cayenne and Toureag. But the Cayenne has it's
own suspension, engines, body and interior. It's only the bare bones of the
chassis
> that are the same and this says nothing of the 911 or Boxster or any of
the
> other Audi/VW models.
>
> >Audi/Por are more a like than you would like to admit
>
> HOW? They don't share parts, they don't co-develop models, they've got
nothing in common beyod familial connections.
>
> >I've also quoted the three mags
>
> No you didn't.
>
> >Motor Trend is better and so is R & T
>
> Ha! MT and R&T are hack job mags, and admittedly C&D is only a marginal
step up.

are you stupid, the tranny and engines are the same in the 911 and RS6. now
I know you know nothing about the cars, do some research and get back to me
you are not dumber than Michelle. Yes they do dumbass pick up a mag. and do
some READING. ok if you say MT is a hack job I believe you just like
Audi/Por don't share any parts.

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040410161113.14046.00000118@mb-m05.aol.com...
> >No I've seen it,
>
> So that's why you continued to claim that the S4 hadn't made C&D's 2004
10Best list after I provided the URL?
>
> >and all the urls I've posted you have glossed passed.
>
> I'll Paypal you $100 if you can show proof that you ever provided a link
to this discussion.
>
> >Stevie I won my own vehicle
>
> Dare I ask in what kind of contest? And is a car really that useful to a
13 year old?
>
> >you still try to pimp out your parents ride??
>
> No, I cashed out $22,000 in stock and bought myself a car.
>
> >Not at all, my point is that, you only cite, rallying and rallying
derived cars
>
> What? You claimed very recently that Touring and Rallye are the same
thing. In addition; the Skyline, 3000GT, Eclipse GSX, 911 Turbo, S4/RS4 and
S6/RS6 were all on my list, NONE of which are rally derived.
>
> >I know the difference last time I check the FWD Stratus does well
>
> You're offically the village idiot.
>
> >I never said it was better
>
> This certainly isn't what you were saying before. Maybe if you backpeddle
a little harder no one will remember what was really said before.
>
> >Stevie why is it that you can't prove your point so you start making up
> >stories
>
> The king of liars goes out on a limb, and lies about me fabricating
stories and being unable to prove my point. What a surprise.

no why would I want to take your tax refund. is 13 the age of your
"girlfriend"?? was the 22Gs you got form a mis-handled change?? the
300 GT is not AWD, the GSX was def. rally derived. no Stevie with all your
post you show you are. I never backpedaled you just take stuff out of
context.

what point over and over angina you say you've made a point not one I can
see.

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040410162104.14046.00000120@mb-m05.aol.com...
> >all the companies you listed have cars that are derived from
> >lessons learned from rallying
>
> Spew, spew and spew. You're running out of bullshit.
>
> >and two are the same company
>
> Which 2 are the same company?
>
> > Like I said that's an old campro
>
> But it's the most recent with both an M3 and an S4 and it's less than a
year old. It's also the comparo where you claimed that that the S4 won
simply
for being easier to drive, which obviously isn't the case. You lied about
this
> article through dozens of posts, and now you're trying to weazel your way
clear because I've nailed you.
>
> >I've proved that the S4 was not compared to the best small sports sedans
>
> Yea, it was. And according to you, the M3 is the pinnacle of performance
in a car of it;s size and type. And the S4 trounced it.
>
> >dumb dumb, you do realize that the M3 and S4 are compact by EPA standard
>
> The Environmental Protection Agency says that the M3 and S4 are compact?
Please link to that effect. And also realize that in the context of the C&D
compare, they were "middleweights".

no bullshit, just lots of info something that you don't provide. Audi/Porc.
are you gay is that why you want to nail a guy, I'm scared now. only in C &
D not in over mags but I forgot since you can't prove them wrong their now
marginal, that's funny. www.epa.gov I think that's a link I get your $100
tax refund check now/

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

>Audi/Porc.
>are you gay is that why you want to nail a guy, I'm scared now.

What in god's name are you spewing?

> only in C &
>D not in over mags but I forgot since you can't prove them wrong their now
>margina

You're a throughly inadequte opponent. I refuse to have a battle of the wits
with an unarmed opponent. =)

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

>300 GT is not AWD

The 3000GT VR-4 was AWD, as was the R/T Turbo variant of it's Dodge
counterpart, the Stealth. Both also had All-Wheel-Steering. Should'nt your vast
knowledge of cars and magazines have helped you here?

>the GSX was def. rally derived

No it wasn't. Mitsubishi rallies with the Lancer, they never used the Eclipse
as a rallye car.

Re: Buying new A4,330i, G35, CTS, C320
 

>are you stupid, the tranny and engines are the same in the 911 and RS6.

The 911 is running a 3.6 litre flat-six developed by Porsche. The RS6 is
running a 4.2 litre, twin-turbocharged V8 developed by the sport division at
Audi. Who's stupid?