Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:14:07 GMT, "Noozer" <dontspam@me.here> wrote:
>> Your comments don't appear to be grounded in reality. You are either >> very naive or live in a rural area and are retired and have nowhere to >> go on a regular basis. > >So it's OK to break into your home and steal your TV as long as I don't get >caught? I guess you're too stupid to understand the difference between a crime which hurts others, and a victimless "crime" like the vast majority of "speeding" is. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
> > I guess you're too stupid to understand the difference between a crime > which hurts others, and a victimless "crime" like the vast majority of > "speeding" is. The vast majority of speeding is indeed victimless, but---------everyone who speeds and by speeding, I do not mean 5-10 mph over the limit does indeed increase the risk of danger to those also on the road. I have had my share of fun with my Porsche over the years. Fun like sliding around corners in the mountains and trying to see just how fast I could go without losing it. I have traveled my share of mountain roads in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and have felt the fear of finding a Porsche, BMW or other fast ride over the center lane when there are no guard rails on my side. I have driven the canyons of the USA and know the fear of seeing novice Porsche drivers sliding around corners toward me. I have seen a BMW driver using a cell phone pass me at well over a 100mph and have found the same BMW a few miles down the road in a tree, not against a tree but in the tree after hitting a tour bus. You might be a good driver, you might even be a great driver but the truth is that unwarranted speed not only tests your capabilities as a "home grown" Michael Schumacher but it tests those on the road who do not aspire to Formula One status and speed. Do I like the speed limits? Not always but I can tell you that I adore them after being forced off the road on some mountain road by someone who thinks that speed limits are for dummies. Do I like speed limits on the super highways which are often straight and wide? Not always but I have found that many who think they are wonderful drivers are an accident waiting to happen and I for one do not wish to be involved in that accident. Mel |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
> > I guess you're too stupid to understand the difference between a crime > which hurts others, and a victimless "crime" like the vast majority of > "speeding" is. The vast majority of speeding is indeed victimless, but---------everyone who speeds and by speeding, I do not mean 5-10 mph over the limit does indeed increase the risk of danger to those also on the road. I have had my share of fun with my Porsche over the years. Fun like sliding around corners in the mountains and trying to see just how fast I could go without losing it. I have traveled my share of mountain roads in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and have felt the fear of finding a Porsche, BMW or other fast ride over the center lane when there are no guard rails on my side. I have driven the canyons of the USA and know the fear of seeing novice Porsche drivers sliding around corners toward me. I have seen a BMW driver using a cell phone pass me at well over a 100mph and have found the same BMW a few miles down the road in a tree, not against a tree but in the tree after hitting a tour bus. You might be a good driver, you might even be a great driver but the truth is that unwarranted speed not only tests your capabilities as a "home grown" Michael Schumacher but it tests those on the road who do not aspire to Formula One status and speed. Do I like the speed limits? Not always but I can tell you that I adore them after being forced off the road on some mountain road by someone who thinks that speed limits are for dummies. Do I like speed limits on the super highways which are often straight and wide? Not always but I have found that many who think they are wonderful drivers are an accident waiting to happen and I for one do not wish to be involved in that accident. Mel |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
"dizzy" <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:dub3n0p7oo4sg0mi40dkruqlqtl1r82898@4ax.com... > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:14:07 GMT, "Noozer" <dontspam@me.here> wrote: > >>> Your comments don't appear to be grounded in reality. You are either >>> very naive or live in a rural area and are retired and have nowhere to >>> go on a regular basis. >> >>So it's OK to break into your home and steal your TV as long as I don't >>get >>caught? > > I guess you're too stupid to understand the difference between a crime > which hurts others, and a victimless "crime" like the vast majority of > "speeding" is. Breaking in to homes to steal things is a no no. Speeding is also a no no if you are constantly speeding, passing others, etc. My original post had to do with using a radar detector to warn of speed traps on the highways where I live, on which the speed of ALL vehicles on the road, right lane too, is ALWAYS 10 to 20 kph above the speed limit. For all intents and purposes you CANNOT go the speed limit without impeding traffic flow or causing just about everyone to try and pass you. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
"dizzy" <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:dub3n0p7oo4sg0mi40dkruqlqtl1r82898@4ax.com... > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:14:07 GMT, "Noozer" <dontspam@me.here> wrote: > >>> Your comments don't appear to be grounded in reality. You are either >>> very naive or live in a rural area and are retired and have nowhere to >>> go on a regular basis. >> >>So it's OK to break into your home and steal your TV as long as I don't >>get >>caught? > > I guess you're too stupid to understand the difference between a crime > which hurts others, and a victimless "crime" like the vast majority of > "speeding" is. Breaking in to homes to steal things is a no no. Speeding is also a no no if you are constantly speeding, passing others, etc. My original post had to do with using a radar detector to warn of speed traps on the highways where I live, on which the speed of ALL vehicles on the road, right lane too, is ALWAYS 10 to 20 kph above the speed limit. For all intents and purposes you CANNOT go the speed limit without impeding traffic flow or causing just about everyone to try and pass you. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
<<Are you a little sick of being told that you ought to be ashamed, as an
American, because the French don't respect us?>> What an idiot. It's not just the French who are disgusted with Americans and the American President. 50 yrs of respect and global good will have been destroyed in less than 4. I'm not ashamed. I'm angry and I'm voting. C. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
<<Are you a little sick of being told that you ought to be ashamed, as an
American, because the French don't respect us?>> What an idiot. It's not just the French who are disgusted with Americans and the American President. 50 yrs of respect and global good will have been destroyed in less than 4. I'm not ashamed. I'm angry and I'm voting. C. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
TigerRace1 <tigerrace1@aol.com> wrote:
> <<Are you a little sick of being told that you ought to be ashamed, as an > American, because the French don't respect us?>> > > What an idiot. It's not just the French who are disgusted with Americans and > the American President. And the real question that should be asked is: "Why? Could there be any reasons for that?" -- J.C. |
Re: "stealth" radar installation-MB
TigerRace1 <tigerrace1@aol.com> wrote:
> <<Are you a little sick of being told that you ought to be ashamed, as an > American, because the French don't respect us?>> > > What an idiot. It's not just the French who are disgusted with Americans and > the American President. And the real question that should be asked is: "Why? Could there be any reasons for that?" -- J.C. |
avoiding photo radar -Photo blocker spray technical questions
In article <nothere-ECB9F0.14235912102004@news.verizon.net>,
Rich Williamson <nothere@nospam.com> wrote: > > Does anyone have any feedback on the products found at: > > http://phantomplate.com/main.html > > I purchased their spray and the plate shield (Photoshield). I am not > entirely convinced that the spray works. I took some digital flash > photos of my car at night in the driveway. I found that at an angle, > the spray worked and obscured my plate. Straight on, it was not so > good... it gave only a partial or little reflection leaving my plate > readable. > > I asked the company tech guy about it (and sent him the photos), and his > reply was that a flash on a home digital camera is only intended for > 10-15 feet, and that the flash used in photo radar is 10X stronger and > brighter...therefore it would reflect using that type of flash. > > I am not sure if I believe this or not...while it may make sense in > theory,I don't really want to test it in the real world. How about > daytime traffic light or photoradar...wouldn't that need a lower flash > level? Does the equipment adjust for ambient light? > > I am tempted to respray and add more product, but don't know if this > helps or hurts the performance. It does dull the plate, and it looks > like it is starting to build up. I put 5 or 6 coats on the plate (two > separate plates 6 each). > > The Photoshield cover works as advertised... the only negative comment I > would have is that it is not as "undetectable" as stated. You can see > that there is something "distorting" the plate if you got out of your > car beheind me, and were walking up to my car (as a cop would do at a > traffic stop). > > I am unsure if it is truly legal (the plate cover)... while it may be > technically legal, it might get you hassled for using it. > > I welcome any comments or advice from people who have used it or know > more about traffic light or stationary photo radar. > > thanks, > > Rich ************************************************** ************* Here is the company response unedited ... any thoughts on what he says? From: "DavidGreen@phantomplate.com" <davidgreen@phantomplate.com> Subject: RE: problem with spray Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:18:40 -0400 Dear: Mr. Williamson First and foremost, I sincerely apologize for the length it took to respond to this e-mail. If you decide to take a flash photo of you license plate after it has been treated, don't be surprised if the plate numbers are still visible. That doesn't mean that it won't work. You see a standard camera flash is only a few watts. The speed camera is setup with a 340watt "melt your eye balls" flash unit which isn't designed to read the number plate, but designed to pick out your face inside a dark vehicle interior. A standard camera flash sometimes isn't powerful enough to produce a "white out" effect. The correct way to test the effectiveness of our products is to use actual photo-radar equipment. . A personal digital camera is not a photo radar camera. First of all, the car has to be in motion. I don't know how you will be able to take an image using you personal camera. Besides, the flash technology used will not be comparable. The correct way to test the PhotoBlocker spray is using a photo radar camera. That is exactly what Fox News investigative reporters and Denver City Police Department did. As a result PHOTOBLOCKER has become the best selling anti-photo radar spray product in the world. To watch the actual investigated reports please go to http://www.phantomplate.com/video.html. Sincerely DAVID GREEN |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands