RE: 2004 Audi TT
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: 2004 Audi TT
<< Sorry, Audi themselves state 0-100 km/h in 5.6 for the best time a sedan S4
can get. The Avant is slower. >>
You're joking, right? Are you unaware that Audi's numbers are *always*
conservitive? C&D took that car from 0-60 in 5.2 on multiple runs, and tests
from other magazines indicate this as a reliable number. Better tires would
probably drop that time down.
can get. The Avant is slower. >>
You're joking, right? Are you unaware that Audi's numbers are *always*
conservitive? C&D took that car from 0-60 in 5.2 on multiple runs, and tests
from other magazines indicate this as a reliable number. Better tires would
probably drop that time down.
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: 2004 Audi TT
Not joking. 0-60 mph is roughly 0-100 kmh, so I guess we're both saying the
same in a different way. 5.2s for 0-100 kmh is for the M3.
Steve Grauman <oneactor1@aol.com> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
20030702151549.02096.00000032@mb-m07.aol.com...
> << Sorry, Audi themselves state 0-100 km/h in 5.6 for the best time a
sedan S4
> can get. The Avant is slower. >>
>
> You're joking, right? Are you unaware that Audi's numbers are *always*
> conservitive? C&D took that car from 0-60 in 5.2 on multiple runs, and
tests
> from other magazines indicate this as a reliable number. Better tires
would
> probably drop that time down.
same in a different way. 5.2s for 0-100 kmh is for the M3.
Steve Grauman <oneactor1@aol.com> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
20030702151549.02096.00000032@mb-m07.aol.com...
> << Sorry, Audi themselves state 0-100 km/h in 5.6 for the best time a
sedan S4
> can get. The Avant is slower. >>
>
> You're joking, right? Are you unaware that Audi's numbers are *always*
> conservitive? C&D took that car from 0-60 in 5.2 on multiple runs, and
tests
> from other magazines indicate this as a reliable number. Better tires
would
> probably drop that time down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)