Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
I currently agree
|
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
I currently agree
|
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
I currently agree
|
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
charles blassberg wrote: > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? Even better, how about not starting a *whole new thread* on the issue! Sheesh, TWO new threads (neither of which are on the subject of Audi automobiles) for a meta-discussion. What next - massive cross-posting? HTML? Binaries? E.P. |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
charles blassberg wrote: > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? Even better, how about not starting a *whole new thread* on the issue! Sheesh, TWO new threads (neither of which are on the subject of Audi automobiles) for a meta-discussion. What next - massive cross-posting? HTML? Binaries? E.P. |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
charles blassberg wrote: > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? Even better, how about not starting a *whole new thread* on the issue! Sheesh, TWO new threads (neither of which are on the subject of Audi automobiles) for a meta-discussion. What next - massive cross-posting? HTML? Binaries? E.P. |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
"charles blassberg" <blassberg@email.com> wrote in message news:3bn87uF6hcd95U1@individual.net... > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? This is usenet, offtopic is part of the fun time, get used to it. > I'm up for reading about JP's EDL experiment and Suspension recalls but > dont want that intertwined with newsgroup etiquette. > > Meanwhile trying to find out what's wrong with top-posting... Top posting is an age old taboo, that was written by the elders > Personally I remove all reply references by default so that only my > message shows. Nice, thats helpfull for others I am sure <not>, remember people do search in Google groups for help in years to come. I use Mozilla Thunderbird and set newsgroup to View > Threads With Unread Only. That way I guess 90+% of server space is not > duplication (if its stored that way...?), i can refer to the original > thread and can flick through the replies without searching top or bottom > or inbetween for the new bits. Ahhhh I get it now, you want to change usenet to suit your browsing style, and to support a browser that is used by less then 2% of people. > That i find convenient, not sure if that's what some people are > referring to as lazy. Lazy > If missing out the reply references is difficult for the way others read > my posts I'll add them back in. Have you just posted your first post, to complain about other people posts? if so you are a troll. You know where the door is..... |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
"charles blassberg" <blassberg@email.com> wrote in message news:3bn87uF6hcd95U1@individual.net... > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? This is usenet, offtopic is part of the fun time, get used to it. > I'm up for reading about JP's EDL experiment and Suspension recalls but > dont want that intertwined with newsgroup etiquette. > > Meanwhile trying to find out what's wrong with top-posting... Top posting is an age old taboo, that was written by the elders > Personally I remove all reply references by default so that only my > message shows. Nice, thats helpfull for others I am sure <not>, remember people do search in Google groups for help in years to come. I use Mozilla Thunderbird and set newsgroup to View > Threads With Unread Only. That way I guess 90+% of server space is not > duplication (if its stored that way...?), i can refer to the original > thread and can flick through the replies without searching top or bottom > or inbetween for the new bits. Ahhhh I get it now, you want to change usenet to suit your browsing style, and to support a browser that is used by less then 2% of people. > That i find convenient, not sure if that's what some people are > referring to as lazy. Lazy > If missing out the reply references is difficult for the way others read > my posts I'll add them back in. Have you just posted your first post, to complain about other people posts? if so you are a troll. You know where the door is..... |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
"charles blassberg" <blassberg@email.com> wrote in message news:3bn87uF6hcd95U1@individual.net... > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? This is usenet, offtopic is part of the fun time, get used to it. > I'm up for reading about JP's EDL experiment and Suspension recalls but > dont want that intertwined with newsgroup etiquette. > > Meanwhile trying to find out what's wrong with top-posting... Top posting is an age old taboo, that was written by the elders > Personally I remove all reply references by default so that only my > message shows. Nice, thats helpfull for others I am sure <not>, remember people do search in Google groups for help in years to come. I use Mozilla Thunderbird and set newsgroup to View > Threads With Unread Only. That way I guess 90+% of server space is not > duplication (if its stored that way...?), i can refer to the original > thread and can flick through the replies without searching top or bottom > or inbetween for the new bits. Ahhhh I get it now, you want to change usenet to suit your browsing style, and to support a browser that is used by less then 2% of people. > That i find convenient, not sure if that's what some people are > referring to as lazy. Lazy > If missing out the reply references is difficult for the way others read > my posts I'll add them back in. Have you just posted your first post, to complain about other people posts? if so you are a troll. You know where the door is..... |
Re: Newsgroup Etiquette
Ronny wrote: > "charles blassberg" <blassberg@email.com> wrote in message > news:3bn87uF6hcd95U1@individual.net... > > Can we pls keep on topic within a thread? > > This is usenet, offtopic is part of the fun time, get used to it. And what's even more humorous is that the meta-discussion couldn't just reside in the original thread - no, perish the thought - it had to spawn TWO new threads, including this one! On-topic, LOL. Let's all start posting in all-caps, HTML, with attached binaries. After all, any preference is valid, right? :roll eyes: E.P. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands