"AstraVanMan" <Peter@SwerveWeb.com> wrote in message news:<izQ2b.4224$MS5.73220@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>...
> > The fundemental difference is this: your info was of zero value. To
> > anyone. Why? Becaue it was completely incorrect, not based on fact,
> > and totally without merit. My info, OTOH, was just not helpful to
> > your situation. It *was* accurate, and true.
>
> So was mine - a chip and an uprated head gasket would have upped the power.

Ah, Peter, that is a nice attempt at spin. *If* you had actually said
that, I would have agreed with you. But that's *not* the whole story,
now is it?

> All I missed out was a forged crankshaft and an uprated turbo.

Intercooler? Exhaust? You *still* don't have it right, even after
all the info has been posted innumerable times!

I am simply amazed at your lack of anything resembling knowledge.

> Sorry about
> that.

Somehow, I think that you're not sorry at all.

> Can't see how it was anything to do with you anyway - you didn't ask
> that question.

So what? What part of "alt" don't you get? Here's another clue for
the terminally clue-proof: if you don't want your comments seen by
the public, with the potential for response, send them by e-mail.
HTH.

> > > All in
> > > response to a question about 5-cylinder engines, which happen to be no
> > > longer available in new Audis.
> >
> > Really? Who knew? [rolls eyes]
>
> Well you did

[snip]

Peter, look up the word "sarcasm," and try and apply it.

> > > > If you are having difficulty with the cirriculum, I'm sure that
> > > > another opportunity will present itself in the future for another
> > > > lesson.
> > >
> > > And can I suggest spelling lessons for you - it's "curriculum".
> >
> > A *spelling* flame? How incredibly witty and perceptive.
>
> Well, I do my best.

If that's the best you have, then you're even more an idiot than I had
originally feared.

> Awfully sorry if it's not good enough for you.

Nothing to do with "good" or "bad," it's just stupid and lame.

Spider