Q5 - Q7 For the Q5 and the new Q7

2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 09:39 AM
  #11  
flogsta's Avatar
Audi Forum - Posts like an A3
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 74
From: Toronto
flogsta is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Originally Posted by afretes
The 2.0t engine will outsell the 3.2 2 to 1 in no time. I'm already seeing it. Very few people are interested in more HP, saving money is the main concern. I'll give the 3.2 another year before it gets dicontinued.
Hi Alex, You are saying that you think the 2.0 will outsell the 3.2 by 2 to 1. Why is Audi Canada introducing the 3.2 first and not the 2.0? I asked this question at an Audi Event one of the Audi Mktg. Managers and the answer was that North American consumers still like the big engine for this type of car. Now, I bought the 3.2 because I could not wait any longer but I would have chosen the 2.0 without question. I see the statistics in Germany, the 2.0 and 2.0TDI are the preferred engines.

I just do not get it why introduce the 'big' engine and then 'discontinue' it after 2 years. Give the people more choices....
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #12  
tomashek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 287
From: Barrie, Ontario
tomashek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Originally Posted by flogsta
Hi Alex, You are saying that you think the 2.0 will outsell the 3.2 by 2 to 1. Why is Audi Canada introducing the 3.2 first and not the 2.0? I asked this question at an Audi Event one of the Audi Mktg. Managers and the answer was that North American consumers still like the big engine for this type of car. Now, I bought the 3.2 because I could not wait any longer but I would have chosen the 2.0 without question. I see the statistics in Germany, the 2.0 and 2.0TDI are the preferred engines.

I just do not get it why introduce the 'big' engine and then 'discontinue' it after 2 years. Give the people more choices....
Well, that's because North Americans prefer/ed? bigger emgines, right. That's why you see Hemi engines in sedans.......It's personal preference, but in my opinion it's ridiculous choice. Unfortunately vast majority of Canadians and Americans think otherwise, hence Audi's decision.
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #13  
warcity's Avatar
Moderator



iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,487
From: Toronto -GTA
warcity is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.

Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #14  
tomashek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 287
From: Barrie, Ontario
tomashek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Originally Posted by warcity
Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.

Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
Where did you get that info from? I checked and its rated 17 mpg city/25 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined. How is this superior to 2.0T???
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #15  
tomashek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 287
From: Barrie, Ontario
tomashek is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Originally Posted by warcity
Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.

Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
I was just presenting point of view, and hard facts. Europe thinks way differently than us here. Their perception, and I can't blame them for it, is that Americans and Canadians want bigger engines, pure and simple. Its up to us to change it, and I think we slowely started doing it. So hopefully soon we have more diesel choices......
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 11:14 AM
  #16  
warcity's Avatar
Moderator



iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,487
From: Toronto -GTA
warcity is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Originally Posted by tomashek
Where did you get that info from? I checked and its rated 17 mpg city/25 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined. How is this superior to 2.0T???
My apologies BMW's engine is 3.0 L NOT 3.5 but same statement applies. I am not a fan of BMW at all. I love my Audi. I was using it as a simple example. I don't like posting anything BMW related here but since I am being asked to here it is below.

I just don't like the idea of folks associated big engines with high consumption. That may have been the case 5 or 10 years a go but it's no longer. Same thing in reverse, small engine doesn't necessarily mean low consumption.

We need someone who has actually taken deliver of a 2011 Q5 2.0T to reset their computer and give us a proper reading taking into account their driving conditions/style.
Attached Thumbnails 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption-1.jpg   2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption-2.jpg  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #17  
lawski's Avatar
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
From: The Netherlands
lawski is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Well im from europe and THE main reason why ppl buy the 2.0 and not the 3.2 is that it costs 10000 euro more... But everyone loves the 3.2...


On the Europe market the 2.0 was first.. THAN the 3.2 came..
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #18  
MkIX's Avatar
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 25
From: Bedford, N.S.
MkIX is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

Readers of this forum, including me, will be interrested in user feedback on the 2.0T.
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 09:24 PM
  #19  
flogsta's Avatar
Audi Forum - Posts like an A3
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 74
From: Toronto
flogsta is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

My final words on this I am originally from Germany and live now in Canada. The price might be one reason why the 2.0 engines are more popular in Europe but I personally believe they are more popular because they are simply enough! They are enough for the curved roads and city traffic. I wish Audi and other car makes would offer their customers more choices!
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 03:36 AM
  #20  
1move's Avatar
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,548
From: ....
1move is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption

The 2.0T can and will be modified to its full potential soon enough, I am sure you can take an A4 turbo and stick it on there with minor modifications unless the whole entire engine design has changed.

As far as Europe VS North America i would say it essentially comes down to HP VS Torque. Europe Likes the HP and N.America has always loved the torque. Now before you say us N.Americans love the HP too, look at the bigger picture and ask your self why do we make so many 5.7,5.9.6.2L Engines??? Bigger engines provide a lot of potential for torque on the lower end which suits most N.American lifestyles. How many Europeans own a large boat or a trailer home/RV? Quite honestly next to none, and if it is a boat its already on the sea or lake.

So it will Always and I repeat always be a battle between Stigs fat American cousin or the Stig himself.

If some of you disagree that N.Americans like it bigger next time go to a McDonalds and supersize your fries and drink, that super size in Europe is at most a smaller cup than a medium drink and a small packet of fries. These guys like it compact and efficient, full of energy and not artificially inflated like the domestic engines.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.