TT
Guest
Posts: n/a
The message <4688$43cb85fd$57d403fc$4943@news.versatel.nl>
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The message <4688$43cb85fd$57d403fc$4943@news.versatel.nl>
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The message <4688$43cb85fd$57d403fc$4943@news.versatel.nl>
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
from "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> contains these words:
> > is it a transverse engine........
> >
> All Audi's are the same in that respect.
Really? Mine's longitudinal.
--
Skipweasel
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:39:33 +0100, "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> wrote:
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:39:33 +0100, "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> wrote:
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:39:33 +0100, "R@L" <reply@usenet.com> wrote:
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....
>
>"Harry" <yesitsme@todaysthedaybtinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:dqfft1$7hj$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>> is it a transverse engine........
>>
>
>All Audi's are the same in that respect.
>
>Ronald
So very, very wrong....


