remote unlock
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In message <41e96108$0$5415$a1866201@visi.com>
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In message <41e96108$0$5415$a1866201@visi.com>
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In message <41e96108$0$5415$a1866201@visi.com>
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
Tony <tonyjnospam@nospamvisi.com> wrote:
> The local FCC office might be interested...
I'm sure that the regulatory body ought to be concerned but, according
to this page, Ofcom aren't going to take the slightest interest -
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_gui.../interference/
>
> AustinMini.OsiTech.Net wrote:
> > What were you expecting them to do?
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In article <csa4k1$5hn$1@sparta.btinternet.com>,
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In article <csa4k1$5hn$1@sparta.btinternet.com>,
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: remote unlock
In article <csa4k1$5hn$1@sparta.btinternet.com>,
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
engelbert <abirdinhand@isworthabushbtinternet.com> wrote:
>A4 but it matters not I think,
There's a street in Cambridge (Massachusetts, USA) where both
Audi and BMW remotes are unreliable.
I use the key and hope that I never have a problem while the locks
are stuck or inaccessible. I wish more doors had mechanical locks.
--
John Carr (jfc@mit.edu)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
profits23@hotmail.com
Audi Mailing List
51
09-28-2006 07:13 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)