Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
#131
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>
> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
> than 3 lines of a prev post.
Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
news threaded.
Right?
E.P.
#132
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>
> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
> than 3 lines of a prev post.
Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
news threaded.
Right?
E.P.
#133
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>
> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
> than 3 lines of a prev post.
Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
news threaded.
Right?
E.P.
#134
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology - STFU!!!
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#135
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology - STFU!!!
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#136
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology - STFU!!!
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
>> and leave those of us who employ their common sense alone!
>
> So you *do* read from bottom to top? Nobody I know does that - it
> doesn't seem all that common to me...
>
>> In other words, you dont know what you are talking about... you are
>> bitching about the wrong thing and you argument is as stupid as those
>> who complain about 'wasting bandwidth on a text NG'
>
> LOL. Classic usenet - get proven wrong, claim victory and try to
> shout down and insult the other posters.
>
>> so just STFU!
>
> Big talk from some anonymous guy hiding behind a computer screen. You
> some kind of usenet tough guy?
>
>
Argghhh this is just as much fun... tho more ridiculous.. than when I was
using character terminals to argue it.
So that makes it.. what... about 15 years, since my company put up an
internet gateway and I started reading this (ford) group.
What I DO, Dumbass.. and I feel I know you well enough now to use that
term of endearment.. is I read the entire thread. If there's something
of interest to me, I have to do that, dont I?
Thus I prove my point, and you ignore it so as to keep your pointless
position viable.
You note I'm bottom posting here.. and that's what I usually do on a
longer thread.
If I'm the first responder to a simple question or issue, I usually top-
post.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#137
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#138
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#139
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
>
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> Just read the freaking posts in thread order, I'd be fine if NG's were
>> still being developed and if a rule was made that you couldnt quote more
>> than 3 lines of a prev post.
>
> Because *everybody* uses a threaded reader, and *everybody* reads their
> news threaded.
>
> Right?
If you dont, that's tough ... why would you set it any other way? Just
so you can bitch?
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
#140
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Apology to all for my Netiquette "Sorry"
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
A. Who are the biggest idiots on Usenet?
>
> A: Top-posters.
>
> Q: What's the most annoying thing about Usenet.
>
>
Q. Opening statement concerning people who set their readers for best
binaries viewing then complain about top posting in conversational groups.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
A. Who are the biggest idiots on Usenet?
>
> A: Top-posters.
>
> Q: What's the most annoying thing about Usenet.
>
>
Q. Opening statement concerning people who set their readers for best
binaries viewing then complain about top posting in conversational groups.
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!