Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
"GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
"GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
"GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
igqi4191rg78rqbrp90okbirve0g4neoqs@4ax.com...
>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>
The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
--
G. Tarantino - Switzerland
1997 BMW 535 (148,000 miles)
1997 Audi A4 Q (149,000 miles)
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
In article <d2et38$qe5$1@news.hispeed.ch>,
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
In article <d2et38$qe5$1@news.hispeed.ch>,
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Opinions on 2002 A6 2.7 or 4.2
In article <d2et38$qe5$1@news.hispeed.ch>,
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle
"GT" <Tarantino@111.com> writes:
> "GJM" <glenmac@ptd.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>I am interested in the 2002 A6, eitther the 2.7T or the 4.2. Was just
>> wondering what others thought of this year, any reliability issues?
>>
> The automatic gearbox is prone to fail. A friend of mine had to replace it
> twice before 100,000 kilometers (Audi A6 2.7 biturbo).
Is this same gearbox as in the All-Road or does it have a more
rugged unit? Are newer years also prone to fail?
--
- Kyle