New Audi A4 revealed!
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
Ronny wrote:
> Whats a 2005 TT, I thought we were in 2004, this would make it 2004 TT, or
> am I missing somthing?
>
> If you bought the car on Jan 1st 2005 and it was registered on that day then
> you would have a 2005 car.
>
> Is this some wierd american science?
Technically, in the US, any model of car released after January 1 of
year N can be called an (N+1) model. I purchased my "2003" Passat in
November of 2002.
--
Mike Smith
> Whats a 2005 TT, I thought we were in 2004, this would make it 2004 TT, or
> am I missing somthing?
>
> If you bought the car on Jan 1st 2005 and it was registered on that day then
> you would have a 2005 car.
>
> Is this some wierd american science?
Technically, in the US, any model of car released after January 1 of
year N can be called an (N+1) model. I purchased my "2003" Passat in
November of 2002.
--
Mike Smith
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
I think they got their inspiration from the new Caddy's and Chrysler 300's.
"+ Rob +" <frankr#N1O2@S3P4A5M6#mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:IMg%c.9551$w%6.1416@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
>
> "webmaster_audi4u" <info@audi4u.net> wrote in message
> news:chjotf$7m9$1@ares.cs.utwente.nl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new Audi A4 has been revealed officially. Read more about it at:
>>
>> http://www.audi4u.net
>>
>
> If this is what the next A4 is going to look like, I'm glad I have a
> current one. Because that's hideous! What in the world are they thinking
> with that design?!?! (Is Chris Bangle now moonlighting for Audi as well?)
> Not since the latest Camry have I seen a design so bland, yet
> simultaneously
> so ugly...
>
> Rob
> 2002 A4 3.0Q
> 2005 TT 3.2 DSG (as of tomorrow)
>
>
"+ Rob +" <frankr#N1O2@S3P4A5M6#mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:IMg%c.9551$w%6.1416@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
>
> "webmaster_audi4u" <info@audi4u.net> wrote in message
> news:chjotf$7m9$1@ares.cs.utwente.nl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new Audi A4 has been revealed officially. Read more about it at:
>>
>> http://www.audi4u.net
>>
>
> If this is what the next A4 is going to look like, I'm glad I have a
> current one. Because that's hideous! What in the world are they thinking
> with that design?!?! (Is Chris Bangle now moonlighting for Audi as well?)
> Not since the latest Camry have I seen a design so bland, yet
> simultaneously
> so ugly...
>
> Rob
> 2002 A4 3.0Q
> 2005 TT 3.2 DSG (as of tomorrow)
>
>
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
I think they got their inspiration from the new Caddy's and Chrysler 300's.
"+ Rob +" <frankr#N1O2@S3P4A5M6#mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:IMg%c.9551$w%6.1416@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
>
> "webmaster_audi4u" <info@audi4u.net> wrote in message
> news:chjotf$7m9$1@ares.cs.utwente.nl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new Audi A4 has been revealed officially. Read more about it at:
>>
>> http://www.audi4u.net
>>
>
> If this is what the next A4 is going to look like, I'm glad I have a
> current one. Because that's hideous! What in the world are they thinking
> with that design?!?! (Is Chris Bangle now moonlighting for Audi as well?)
> Not since the latest Camry have I seen a design so bland, yet
> simultaneously
> so ugly...
>
> Rob
> 2002 A4 3.0Q
> 2005 TT 3.2 DSG (as of tomorrow)
>
>
"+ Rob +" <frankr#N1O2@S3P4A5M6#mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:IMg%c.9551$w%6.1416@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
>
> "webmaster_audi4u" <info@audi4u.net> wrote in message
> news:chjotf$7m9$1@ares.cs.utwente.nl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new Audi A4 has been revealed officially. Read more about it at:
>>
>> http://www.audi4u.net
>>
>
> If this is what the next A4 is going to look like, I'm glad I have a
> current one. Because that's hideous! What in the world are they thinking
> with that design?!?! (Is Chris Bangle now moonlighting for Audi as well?)
> Not since the latest Camry have I seen a design so bland, yet
> simultaneously
> so ugly...
>
> Rob
> 2002 A4 3.0Q
> 2005 TT 3.2 DSG (as of tomorrow)
>
>
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
For most of my lifetime the US automakers worker on a three year cycle with
minor changes yearly and a major change every three years.
As for the model years they operated on a Sept-July calendar. The "1971"
models usually came out in Sept 1970. Sometimes if there was a mid-year
change or a new model it came out as the following year's model.
"Peter Bell" <peter@invalid.org.uk> wrote in message
news:305c6feb4c.peter@iyonix.earley.fourcom.com...
> In message <TgL%c.3410$7k3.33372322@news-text.cableinet.net>
> "ronny" <ronny@ron.com> wrote:
>
>> A must be a US thing
>
> Indeed. The US consumers seem to expect a car to be updated every year.
> I believe that the body styles used to be changed annually - such that a
> '57 car would look different to (than?) a '58, which would be different
> to (than?) a '59.
>
> As for the next year's model coming out part way throught the previous
> year - this is just a result of the manufacturers' race to be the first
> to market with the new model. It's not really much different to the
> September issue of a magazine hitting the shelves at the beginning of
> August!
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
minor changes yearly and a major change every three years.
As for the model years they operated on a Sept-July calendar. The "1971"
models usually came out in Sept 1970. Sometimes if there was a mid-year
change or a new model it came out as the following year's model.
"Peter Bell" <peter@invalid.org.uk> wrote in message
news:305c6feb4c.peter@iyonix.earley.fourcom.com...
> In message <TgL%c.3410$7k3.33372322@news-text.cableinet.net>
> "ronny" <ronny@ron.com> wrote:
>
>> A must be a US thing
>
> Indeed. The US consumers seem to expect a car to be updated every year.
> I believe that the body styles used to be changed annually - such that a
> '57 car would look different to (than?) a '58, which would be different
> to (than?) a '59.
>
> As for the next year's model coming out part way throught the previous
> year - this is just a result of the manufacturers' race to be the first
> to market with the new model. It's not really much different to the
> September issue of a magazine hitting the shelves at the beginning of
> August!
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
For most of my lifetime the US automakers worker on a three year cycle with
minor changes yearly and a major change every three years.
As for the model years they operated on a Sept-July calendar. The "1971"
models usually came out in Sept 1970. Sometimes if there was a mid-year
change or a new model it came out as the following year's model.
"Peter Bell" <peter@invalid.org.uk> wrote in message
news:305c6feb4c.peter@iyonix.earley.fourcom.com...
> In message <TgL%c.3410$7k3.33372322@news-text.cableinet.net>
> "ronny" <ronny@ron.com> wrote:
>
>> A must be a US thing
>
> Indeed. The US consumers seem to expect a car to be updated every year.
> I believe that the body styles used to be changed annually - such that a
> '57 car would look different to (than?) a '58, which would be different
> to (than?) a '59.
>
> As for the next year's model coming out part way throught the previous
> year - this is just a result of the manufacturers' race to be the first
> to market with the new model. It's not really much different to the
> September issue of a magazine hitting the shelves at the beginning of
> August!
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
minor changes yearly and a major change every three years.
As for the model years they operated on a Sept-July calendar. The "1971"
models usually came out in Sept 1970. Sometimes if there was a mid-year
change or a new model it came out as the following year's model.
"Peter Bell" <peter@invalid.org.uk> wrote in message
news:305c6feb4c.peter@iyonix.earley.fourcom.com...
> In message <TgL%c.3410$7k3.33372322@news-text.cableinet.net>
> "ronny" <ronny@ron.com> wrote:
>
>> A must be a US thing
>
> Indeed. The US consumers seem to expect a car to be updated every year.
> I believe that the body styles used to be changed annually - such that a
> '57 car would look different to (than?) a '58, which would be different
> to (than?) a '59.
>
> As for the next year's model coming out part way throught the previous
> year - this is just a result of the manufacturers' race to be the first
> to market with the new model. It's not really much different to the
> September issue of a magazine hitting the shelves at the beginning of
> August!
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
> We used to get license (registration) plates annually also that were a
> different color combination every year and by the end of the year were so
> rusted you could barely read the numbers!
ps
Each state had (and still has) a different plate design/color and numbering
scheme
> We couldnt get away with it over here, a car registered in 2004 would be a
> 2004 model, We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you
> know
> about, I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of
> a
> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
>
> different color combination every year and by the end of the year were so
> rusted you could barely read the numbers!
ps
Each state had (and still has) a different plate design/color and numbering
scheme
> We couldnt get away with it over here, a car registered in 2004 would be a
> 2004 model, We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you
> know
> about, I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of
> a
> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
>
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
> We used to get license (registration) plates annually also that were a
> different color combination every year and by the end of the year were so
> rusted you could barely read the numbers!
ps
Each state had (and still has) a different plate design/color and numbering
scheme
> We couldnt get away with it over here, a car registered in 2004 would be a
> 2004 model, We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you
> know
> about, I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of
> a
> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
>
> different color combination every year and by the end of the year were so
> rusted you could barely read the numbers!
ps
Each state had (and still has) a different plate design/color and numbering
scheme
> We couldnt get away with it over here, a car registered in 2004 would be a
> 2004 model, We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you
> know
> about, I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of
> a
> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
>
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
I bought my daughter's '01 A4 "new" in 2003. The title says '01, the
warranty started in '03 (when it was put in service) We call these cars
"leftovers", you get a new car with a new car warranty at a used car price
and yes, they did put a new battery in it before delivery.
>
> We tend to rely too heavily on registration year, and that may mislead
> someone over the actual specification of the car. For instance, someone
> recently came across a few unregistered S3s, which are now (being?) sold
> and registered with '54' plates. Now, as far as I am aware, S3
> production ceased towards the end of 2003. So, are these cars really
> 2004 models? Of course not. They are 2003 cars which have, in all
> probability, sat around in a field for the best part of a year.
>
>> We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you know about,
>
> Yes - I think I know about it!
>
>> I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of a
>> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
> Indeed.
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
warranty started in '03 (when it was put in service) We call these cars
"leftovers", you get a new car with a new car warranty at a used car price
and yes, they did put a new battery in it before delivery.
>
> We tend to rely too heavily on registration year, and that may mislead
> someone over the actual specification of the car. For instance, someone
> recently came across a few unregistered S3s, which are now (being?) sold
> and registered with '54' plates. Now, as far as I am aware, S3
> production ceased towards the end of 2003. So, are these cars really
> 2004 models? Of course not. They are 2003 cars which have, in all
> probability, sat around in a field for the best part of a year.
>
>> We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you know about,
>
> Yes - I think I know about it!
>
>> I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of a
>> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
> Indeed.
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
I bought my daughter's '01 A4 "new" in 2003. The title says '01, the
warranty started in '03 (when it was put in service) We call these cars
"leftovers", you get a new car with a new car warranty at a used car price
and yes, they did put a new battery in it before delivery.
>
> We tend to rely too heavily on registration year, and that may mislead
> someone over the actual specification of the car. For instance, someone
> recently came across a few unregistered S3s, which are now (being?) sold
> and registered with '54' plates. Now, as far as I am aware, S3
> production ceased towards the end of 2003. So, are these cars really
> 2004 models? Of course not. They are 2003 cars which have, in all
> probability, sat around in a field for the best part of a year.
>
>> We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you know about,
>
> Yes - I think I know about it!
>
>> I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of a
>> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
> Indeed.
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
warranty started in '03 (when it was put in service) We call these cars
"leftovers", you get a new car with a new car warranty at a used car price
and yes, they did put a new battery in it before delivery.
>
> We tend to rely too heavily on registration year, and that may mislead
> someone over the actual specification of the car. For instance, someone
> recently came across a few unregistered S3s, which are now (being?) sold
> and registered with '54' plates. Now, as far as I am aware, S3
> production ceased towards the end of 2003. So, are these cars really
> 2004 models? Of course not. They are 2003 cars which have, in all
> probability, sat around in a field for the best part of a year.
>
>> We also have a number plate year system which i'm sure you know about,
>
> Yes - I think I know about it!
>
>> I just found it strange someone saying they are taking delivery of a
>> 2005 car and theres still nearly 4 months of 2004 left
>
> Indeed.
>
> --
> Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with
> 'bellfamily')
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Audi A4 revealed!
We export high quality used cars and trucks from Germany. All Left hand
drives.
We export BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Porsche, Mitsubishi, Honda, Volvo, Toyota,
Peugeot, Renault, Citroen, Volkswagen, Isuzu, Huyndai etc.
Please call or tell us if you have any questions. If you dont find the product
you need, just contact us so we can find it for you.
Agents wanted.
Please visit our website. www.shopeuro.biz
drives.
We export BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Porsche, Mitsubishi, Honda, Volvo, Toyota,
Peugeot, Renault, Citroen, Volkswagen, Isuzu, Huyndai etc.
Please call or tell us if you have any questions. If you dont find the product
you need, just contact us so we can find it for you.
Agents wanted.
Please visit our website. www.shopeuro.biz