K&N Filters
Are they worth the money in regards performance increases?
Thanks, Bill Graham |
Re: K&N Filters
Bill Graham wrote:
> Are they worth the money in regards performance increases? > > Thanks, > > Bill Graham > No. |
Re: K&N Filters
"Bill Graham" <whgraham@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:BBD339C4.20DAA%whgraham@nc.rr.com... > Are they worth the money in regards performance increases? > > Thanks, > > Bill Graham > I did not notice any with my S3. Perhaps with exhaust modifications? Also, there been reports of oil contaminating the MAF sensor, IIRC. -- Doug Ramage ***Watch Spam Trap*** |
Re: K&N Filters
Doug Ramage wrote:
> "Bill Graham" <whgraham@nc.rr.com> wrote in message > news:BBD339C4.20DAA%whgraham@nc.rr.com... > >>Are they worth the money in regards performance increases? >> >>Thanks, >> >>Bill Graham >> > > > I did not notice any with my S3. Perhaps with exhaust modifications? > > Also, there been reports of oil contaminating the MAF sensor, IIRC. > -- > Doug Ramage > > ***Watch Spam Trap*** > > There's no such thing as a free lunch. Free-er flowing filtration means more contaminants in your engine. Also, ever try cleaning and re-oiling a K&N filter? It's a supreme mess. All that hassle, the risk of allowing more crap into your engine, and you *might* get a couple of HP out of it. Hardly seems worthwhile to me... cheers, C |
Re: K&N Filters
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:23:47 GMT, Chris Mauritz <ritz@mordor.net> wrote:
>Doug Ramage wrote: >> "Bill Graham" <whgraham@nc.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:BBD339C4.20DAA%whgraham@nc.rr.com... >> >>>Are they worth the money in regards performance increases? >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Bill Graham >>> >> >> >> I did not notice any with my S3. Perhaps with exhaust modifications? >> >> Also, there been reports of oil contaminating the MAF sensor, IIRC. >> -- >> Doug Ramage >> >> ***Watch Spam Trap*** >> >> > >There's no such thing as a free lunch. Free-er flowing filtration means >more contaminants in your engine. Also, ever try cleaning and re-oiling >a K&N filter? It's a supreme mess. All that hassle, the risk of >allowing more crap into your engine, and you *might* get a couple of HP >out of it. Hardly seems worthwhile to me... I think for street driving you are correct but I do like the K&N for off-road vehicles. They do trap dirt particles very well and though I won't say they are far superior than paper filters its nice to able to wash out a really dirty filter after a long weekend off-road. Cost is a factor too... I installed the K&N's on my Jeep when it was brand new and five years later with 77000+ miles I have the same filter... It has paid for itself, including the extra $11 for the cleaner/oil spray which I just ran out of for the first time. -- Taylor '89 Audi 200 '03 Audi S6 Avant '98 Jeep Cherokee Sport |
Re: K&N Filters
"Bill Graham" <whgraham@nc.rr.com> kirjoitti viestissä
news:BBD339C4.20DAA%whgraham@nc.rr.com... > Are they worth the money in regards performance increases? No - I just saw an article about Audis air intake modifications. As many of us think, that those filters improve performance, this article clearly showed that there aint a bit difference between normal and "tuning" filters, at least performance vise. Article measured air pressure before and after filter and with normal/K&N filter. The difference was almost nothing. The only difference I have noticed is the intake sounds improving, but is that worth in normal traffic, where no one likes to hear those improved intake air sounds after some days! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands