Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On 4 Feb 2007 11:35:36 -0800, "tockeyhockey@gmail.com"
<tockeyhockey@gmail.com> wrote: >i know this sounds crazy, but it there any chance that driving with >the ESP engaged reduces fuel efficiency? You should be driving with esp as a default, i.e. it is always on and requires you to physically press a button to turn it off. With it off, you will experience wheel spin in slippery conditions. I just returned last Sunday from a winter driving school (Tim O'Neal's) in NH that I gave for Christmas to all my kids, their husbands, and my grandchildren with drivers' licenses. If I drove my RS6 with the ESP engaged, it wasn't much fun, and I found it difficult to get it loose. I made all my runs on the three different exercises with it off. I was quicker with it on, but the idea of the school was to hang out the car, lose control (either understeer or oversteer), and regain it. My son's-in-law Audi 4.2 and my grandson's S4 did not have ESP. My wife's Lesux has it, but you couldn't turn it off. No one wanted to drive the Lexus. d;o) Gas mileage? Mine is always a little less in the cold months, probably because it takes longer for the engine to warm to efficient operating temps. Dave |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On 4 Feb 2007 11:35:36 -0800, "tockeyhockey@gmail.com"
<tockeyhockey@gmail.com> wrote: >i know this sounds crazy, but it there any chance that driving with >the ESP engaged reduces fuel efficiency? You should be driving with esp as a default, i.e. it is always on and requires you to physically press a button to turn it off. With it off, you will experience wheel spin in slippery conditions. I just returned last Sunday from a winter driving school (Tim O'Neal's) in NH that I gave for Christmas to all my kids, their husbands, and my grandchildren with drivers' licenses. If I drove my RS6 with the ESP engaged, it wasn't much fun, and I found it difficult to get it loose. I made all my runs on the three different exercises with it off. I was quicker with it on, but the idea of the school was to hang out the car, lose control (either understeer or oversteer), and regain it. My son's-in-law Audi 4.2 and my grandson's S4 did not have ESP. My wife's Lesux has it, but you couldn't turn it off. No one wanted to drive the Lexus. d;o) Gas mileage? Mine is always a little less in the cold months, probably because it takes longer for the engine to warm to efficient operating temps. Dave |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On 4 Feb 2007 11:35:36 -0800, "tockeyhockey@gmail.com"
<tockeyhockey@gmail.com> wrote: >i know this sounds crazy, but it there any chance that driving with >the ESP engaged reduces fuel efficiency? You should be driving with esp as a default, i.e. it is always on and requires you to physically press a button to turn it off. With it off, you will experience wheel spin in slippery conditions. I just returned last Sunday from a winter driving school (Tim O'Neal's) in NH that I gave for Christmas to all my kids, their husbands, and my grandchildren with drivers' licenses. If I drove my RS6 with the ESP engaged, it wasn't much fun, and I found it difficult to get it loose. I made all my runs on the three different exercises with it off. I was quicker with it on, but the idea of the school was to hang out the car, lose control (either understeer or oversteer), and regain it. My son's-in-law Audi 4.2 and my grandson's S4 did not have ESP. My wife's Lesux has it, but you couldn't turn it off. No one wanted to drive the Lexus. d;o) Gas mileage? Mine is always a little less in the cold months, probably because it takes longer for the engine to warm to efficient operating temps. Dave |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
"Dave LaCourse" wrote > My wife's Lesux LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) Pete |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
"Dave LaCourse" wrote > My wife's Lesux LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) Pete |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
"Dave LaCourse" wrote > My wife's Lesux LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) Pete |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
"Dave LaCourse" wrote > My wife's Lesux LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) Pete |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:25:59 -0500, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote: >LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) d;o) Typo, but it truly does sux if you're trying to get it loose. |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:25:59 -0500, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote: >LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) d;o) Typo, but it truly does sux if you're trying to get it loose. |
Re: ESP and fuel efficiency
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:25:59 -0500, "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com>
wrote: >LOL! Haven't heard that one before. :) d;o) Typo, but it truly does sux if you're trying to get it loose. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands