Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:49 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:49 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:49 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
>
>"Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
>news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>> <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>> Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>> shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>> on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>> Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>> Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>Mazda has problems with the rotary engines...
And this is important wrt the Mazda 3....why, exactly?
>Volvo, I guess, but that has an old man image, like a Cadillac...
What planet have you been living on?
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:42:03 -0600, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cam Newton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:50:42 -0500, Mike Smith
>>>><mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dan J.S. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Asfwindsor" <asfwindsor@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:20041207155725.07572.00001849@mb-m01.aol.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am considering a used 3 Series, maybe the Xi model or an Audi
>>>>>>>Quattro A4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thoughts, opinions and facts are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>H Castorp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Both unreliable. Get a Lexus IS.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad it's so ugly.
>>>>
>>>>The IS 300 is too small, no ski sack, flip/fold down seats, FWD...
>>>>shall I go on? Get the Corolla XRS for 1/2 the price if you are stuck
>>>>on a small car.
>>>
>>>The IS is rear wheel drive... and the new one will be AWD...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I am thinking too much weight for the frame with a new AWD system.
>>Everybody is onto AWD but Audi was there first.
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
>
>
The Mazda 3 does not have a rotary engine. Only the RX8.
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
> "Cam Newton" <ccnewto@telus.com> wrote in message
> news:41be056d.16527094@news.gv.shawcable.net...
>
>>
>>Why not an Volvo S40? Or save loadsadough and go with the Mazda 3.
>
>
> Mazda has problems with the rotary engines... Volvo, I guess, but that has
> an old man image, like a Cadillac...
The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
--
Mike Smith
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 4 vs. Bmw 3 Series
>The Mazda 3 uses regular inline-4 engines. Nice ones, too.
>
I test drove a 3 with my brother, nice little car. For around $23k you can get
leather seats, navigation with premium sound, the bigger engine, etc...it's a
hell of a deal. I'd probably think about one to replace my GTI if I wasn't dead
set on waiting another year to year and 1/2 for either an MKV S3 or a BMW
1-series.
Steve Grauman
>
I test drove a 3 with my brother, nice little car. For around $23k you can get
leather seats, navigation with premium sound, the bigger engine, etc...it's a
hell of a deal. I'd probably think about one to replace my GTI if I wasn't dead
set on waiting another year to year and 1/2 for either an MKV S3 or a BMW
1-series.
Steve Grauman