Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
"Saintor" <saintor1@REMOVETHIShotmail.com> wrote in message news:<SaCjc.130469$2V6.1487631@wagner.videotron.ne t>...
> > Here's a clue - folks in another ng have met me, personally. Go ahead
> > and prove who you say I am. Good luck with that.
>
> Again a general statement that proves... nothing.
Just as valid as your "proof." Except that I actually have real
people to vouch for me. If I thought you were grown up enough to
accept your mistake and admit it, I'd give you an e-mail address that
you could use to confirm.
> > > And this is
> > > reinforced by the fact that you changed identity so many times and your
> past
> > > lies.
> >
> > Bzzzt. Changed my posting handle ONCE. My e-mail has stayed the
> > same. Even if you add in this other mythical creature, then I've
> > changed my posting handle twice, and my identity once. So where are
> > the "so many times?" Again, your delusions of intelligence smack
> > against the reality of your incoherence.
>
> You forgot rico@campquake.com.trimit who magically disappeared when
> beelzebubba@hotmail.com came in.
And this coincidence is what you are hanging your hat upon? Did you
even bother to look at the posting headers, you stupid twit?
> Funny that you are always referring to
> Alfa Romeo like he did.
Did you miss the post that mentioned that I owned an Alfetta before I
was married? Hell, I owned a Camaro before I was married, too! And a
six-cyclinder Mustang. And a Honda 350.
I have mentioned Alfa about 4-5 times in the past 5 years. I have
mentioned Porsche and Ferrari about ten times as much. "Always?"
Dream on, moron.
> Spider, this is a model of Alfa Romeo. 'Get it?
Search a little harder for how I aquired that nickname. You obviously
missed it. It would be dumb to call myself some nickname of such a
pedestrian car - I prefer "Diablo." Fits more with my e-mail, huh?
LOL.
> > > And your interest in cycles Jones, where you probably borrowed this
> > > name.
> >
> > I have no idea what this sentence means. Is there a Jones MTB? I've
> > never heard of it, but maybe there is such a thing in the
> > English-impaired part of the world in which you spawned.
>
> Another straight lie. You know cycles Jones as you wrote in an earlier
> post. Funny, Eric (you) also wrote that he owned a motorcycle Jones.
Uh, I ride BIcycles, not MOTORcycles. I gave up my motorcycle when I
went to college - too damn many brain-dead drivers refuse to see folks
on two wheels.
I read the post that you're referring to - you should really learn the
language before you engage in such silliness. He's talking about
something completely different from what you imagine...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ri...pdx.edu&rnum=2
....LOL. Here's a link for you, fool - pay particular attention to the
third definition:
http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?bo...=jones&x=0&y=0
> Face your utter lies, Eric. To the contrary of you, the evidences just
> don't lie.
I'll bet you're really embarrassed right now. If you were an adult,
you'd admit that you were wrong, and just move on along. But you
cannot, which proves you are nothing but a pimply-faced teenager,
stuck in the basement dreaming about cars he wants, but can't have.
Sad that you merely aspire to an Accord, LOL.
> > Pointing out that you are an anti-Audi, anti-VW, pro-Honda troll is a
> > service to everyone, except you. To you, it's a malicious destruction
> > of your low-minded "fun."
>
>
> Funny that an anti-Audi troll like me just had his father-in-law purchase a
> 40K$ Audi A6 3.0 CVT 2003. I have always loved Audi designs.
Like I pointed out in another thread, your "friends" and "relatives"
are always the ones with these cars. This thread alone is proof
enough of what I say. Such as recommending the Acura (Honda product)
over the Audi. As always. In any case, I doubt that you actually
have a father-in-law or that if you did, you had anything to do with
his automotive choice. Add to that a doubt that if he did buy a car,
it wasn't an Audi.
Yes, despite your complaints, you are merely a troll. The fact that
you complain about it only cements the fact. Hey, isn't Mommy calling
for mealtime? Better go see what she's serving...
--
Jonesy
> > Here's a clue - folks in another ng have met me, personally. Go ahead
> > and prove who you say I am. Good luck with that.
>
> Again a general statement that proves... nothing.
Just as valid as your "proof." Except that I actually have real
people to vouch for me. If I thought you were grown up enough to
accept your mistake and admit it, I'd give you an e-mail address that
you could use to confirm.
> > > And this is
> > > reinforced by the fact that you changed identity so many times and your
> past
> > > lies.
> >
> > Bzzzt. Changed my posting handle ONCE. My e-mail has stayed the
> > same. Even if you add in this other mythical creature, then I've
> > changed my posting handle twice, and my identity once. So where are
> > the "so many times?" Again, your delusions of intelligence smack
> > against the reality of your incoherence.
>
> You forgot rico@campquake.com.trimit who magically disappeared when
> beelzebubba@hotmail.com came in.
And this coincidence is what you are hanging your hat upon? Did you
even bother to look at the posting headers, you stupid twit?
> Funny that you are always referring to
> Alfa Romeo like he did.
Did you miss the post that mentioned that I owned an Alfetta before I
was married? Hell, I owned a Camaro before I was married, too! And a
six-cyclinder Mustang. And a Honda 350.
I have mentioned Alfa about 4-5 times in the past 5 years. I have
mentioned Porsche and Ferrari about ten times as much. "Always?"
Dream on, moron.
> Spider, this is a model of Alfa Romeo. 'Get it?
Search a little harder for how I aquired that nickname. You obviously
missed it. It would be dumb to call myself some nickname of such a
pedestrian car - I prefer "Diablo." Fits more with my e-mail, huh?
LOL.
> > > And your interest in cycles Jones, where you probably borrowed this
> > > name.
> >
> > I have no idea what this sentence means. Is there a Jones MTB? I've
> > never heard of it, but maybe there is such a thing in the
> > English-impaired part of the world in which you spawned.
>
> Another straight lie. You know cycles Jones as you wrote in an earlier
> post. Funny, Eric (you) also wrote that he owned a motorcycle Jones.
Uh, I ride BIcycles, not MOTORcycles. I gave up my motorcycle when I
went to college - too damn many brain-dead drivers refuse to see folks
on two wheels.
I read the post that you're referring to - you should really learn the
language before you engage in such silliness. He's talking about
something completely different from what you imagine...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ri...pdx.edu&rnum=2
....LOL. Here's a link for you, fool - pay particular attention to the
third definition:
http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?bo...=jones&x=0&y=0
> Face your utter lies, Eric. To the contrary of you, the evidences just
> don't lie.
I'll bet you're really embarrassed right now. If you were an adult,
you'd admit that you were wrong, and just move on along. But you
cannot, which proves you are nothing but a pimply-faced teenager,
stuck in the basement dreaming about cars he wants, but can't have.
Sad that you merely aspire to an Accord, LOL.
> > Pointing out that you are an anti-Audi, anti-VW, pro-Honda troll is a
> > service to everyone, except you. To you, it's a malicious destruction
> > of your low-minded "fun."
>
>
> Funny that an anti-Audi troll like me just had his father-in-law purchase a
> 40K$ Audi A6 3.0 CVT 2003. I have always loved Audi designs.
Like I pointed out in another thread, your "friends" and "relatives"
are always the ones with these cars. This thread alone is proof
enough of what I say. Such as recommending the Acura (Honda product)
over the Audi. As always. In any case, I doubt that you actually
have a father-in-law or that if you did, you had anything to do with
his automotive choice. Add to that a doubt that if he did buy a car,
it wasn't an Audi.
Yes, despite your complaints, you are merely a troll. The fact that
you complain about it only cements the fact. Hey, isn't Mommy calling
for mealtime? Better go see what she's serving...
--
Jonesy
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
Eric, you just keep on tripping in your lies.
- Spider came in when your previous identification vanished. This is
clear.
- Among keywords that you used often in both ID. 'Alfa Romeo',
'Spider', '80q', 'Oregon', no talking about your obvious and unsane
level of frustration that we can see each time you post.
It is just beyond coincidental.
- Spider came in when your previous identification vanished. This is
clear.
- Among keywords that you used often in both ID. 'Alfa Romeo',
'Spider', '80q', 'Oregon', no talking about your obvious and unsane
level of frustration that we can see each time you post.
It is just beyond coincidental.
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
saintor1@hotmail.com (Saintor) wrote in message news:<2fa72884.0404290534.1ebafd5a@posting.google. com>...
> Eric, you just keep on tripping in your lies.
This is hilarious, coming from you...
> - Spider came in when your previous identification vanished. This is
> clear.
A wonderful coincidence - people come and go from USENET all the time.
> - Among keywords that you used often in both ID. 'Alfa Romeo'
Used 4-5 times in the past 5 years. LOL.
> 'Spider'
My previous handle. Wow, I used it a lot. How odd.
> '80q'
A car that my sister-in-law owns.
> 'Oregon'
My wife (and sister-in-law) are from there, and we go there often.
> no talking about your obvious and unsane
> level of frustration that we can see each time you post.
More irony.
> It is just beyond coincidental.
Only in your pointed head. The fact that this other guy was smart
enough to see past your thin veneer of civility into your true
motivation means that he has an above-room-temperature IQ. Seems like
just about everyone else who has ever been on alt.autos.audi has
already figured out what a fool you are. Coincidence? LOL.
You're just a fool - the players change, but you remain a stupid
jackass.
I notice you "forgot" to reply about the "cycle" business. If you
snip it, I guess your assinine crap just goes away, huh? I knew you
weren't man enough to admit your mistakes.
And now we'll go on and expose your "supernews" lie...
--
Jonesy
> Eric, you just keep on tripping in your lies.
This is hilarious, coming from you...
> - Spider came in when your previous identification vanished. This is
> clear.
A wonderful coincidence - people come and go from USENET all the time.
> - Among keywords that you used often in both ID. 'Alfa Romeo'
Used 4-5 times in the past 5 years. LOL.
> 'Spider'
My previous handle. Wow, I used it a lot. How odd.
> '80q'
A car that my sister-in-law owns.
> 'Oregon'
My wife (and sister-in-law) are from there, and we go there often.
> no talking about your obvious and unsane
> level of frustration that we can see each time you post.
More irony.
> It is just beyond coincidental.
Only in your pointed head. The fact that this other guy was smart
enough to see past your thin veneer of civility into your true
motivation means that he has an above-room-temperature IQ. Seems like
just about everyone else who has ever been on alt.autos.audi has
already figured out what a fool you are. Coincidence? LOL.
You're just a fool - the players change, but you remain a stupid
jackass.
I notice you "forgot" to reply about the "cycle" business. If you
snip it, I guess your assinine crap just goes away, huh? I knew you
weren't man enough to admit your mistakes.
And now we'll go on and expose your "supernews" lie...
--
Jonesy
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:56 -0400, "AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
>1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
>acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
>
>Try both and judge for yourself.........
>
>My $0.02
I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
get 3l.
>"Saintor" <saintor1@REMOVETHIShotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:Sneic.55377$HF5.762356@wagner.videotron.net. ..
>> If you don't have the extra $$$ to go with the V6, pass the A4 and get the
>> TL.
>>
>> "Pumba" <jambohakuna@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:icRhc.3109$WC3.27850@ord-read.news.verio.net...
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I am in the market for a new car. I would like opinions regarding the
>> 2003
>> > Audi 1.8T Quatro model. Any concerns/gripes/frustrations etc.......I
>test
>> > drove the car and it felt really "good". However the price is a little
>> > steep close to US $30k. A friend of mine also has the new 2004 Acura
>> > TL....and it looks really "sharp" and for a little extra (just like $2k
>> > more) you get way more bang for your buck (bigger car, bigger engine,
>more
>> > standard features etc). I currently own a Honda and so am a witness to
>> > their reliability. However, I have no experiece with German cars. So I
>> > would like opinions on whether previous Audi owners would still go for
>the
>> > much smaller Audi 1.8T rather than the abundant Acura TL.
>> >
>> > PS - Auto consumer reports also show that the Audi reliability is not up
>> to
>> > par with Acura......any truth to that?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance!
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
wrote:
>I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
>1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
>acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
>
>Try both and judge for yourself.........
>
>My $0.02
I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
get 3l.
>"Saintor" <saintor1@REMOVETHIShotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:Sneic.55377$HF5.762356@wagner.videotron.net. ..
>> If you don't have the extra $$$ to go with the V6, pass the A4 and get the
>> TL.
>>
>> "Pumba" <jambohakuna@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:icRhc.3109$WC3.27850@ord-read.news.verio.net...
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I am in the market for a new car. I would like opinions regarding the
>> 2003
>> > Audi 1.8T Quatro model. Any concerns/gripes/frustrations etc.......I
>test
>> > drove the car and it felt really "good". However the price is a little
>> > steep close to US $30k. A friend of mine also has the new 2004 Acura
>> > TL....and it looks really "sharp" and for a little extra (just like $2k
>> > more) you get way more bang for your buck (bigger car, bigger engine,
>more
>> > standard features etc). I currently own a Honda and so am a witness to
>> > their reliability. However, I have no experiece with German cars. So I
>> > would like opinions on whether previous Audi owners would still go for
>the
>> > much smaller Audi 1.8T rather than the abundant Acura TL.
>> >
>> > PS - Auto consumer reports also show that the Audi reliability is not up
>> to
>> > par with Acura......any truth to that?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance!
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??
Cam Newton (ccnewto@hotmail.com) wrote in message news:<4091697d.18537535@news.gv.shawcable.net>...
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:56 -0400, "AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
> >1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
> >acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
> >
> >Try both and judge for yourself.........
> >
> >My $0.02
>
> I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
> blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
> computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
> get 3l.
>
It has been mentioned before that a chip *could* void a warranty. It
depends on the dealer. I have heard that there are some fairly
liberal dealers out there who will actually install the chip for you
and still honor the warranty. Then, there are the dealers who will
void your warranty for adding an aftermarket stereo. As in, if you
have a suspension problem, they will disallow that as a warranty
repair.
You could hire a lawyer and force them to pay for the repair (as
clearly, the stereo could not have possibly caused any suspension
hassle) but the burden is on you to jump through the hoops to prove
them wrong.
The turbo car is cheaper in inital aquisition, cheaper to run (less
thirsty when off-boost) and has more performance potential AFTER the
warranty has run out. Then you can fiddle with the motor all you
want, and not worry about voiding the powertrain warranty. Before the
warranty runs out, find a dealer that's friendly to chip-tuning, and
you're totally golden.
--
Jonesy
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:56 -0400, "AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
> >1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
> >acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
> >
> >Try both and judge for yourself.........
> >
> >My $0.02
>
> I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
> blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
> computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
> get 3l.
>
It has been mentioned before that a chip *could* void a warranty. It
depends on the dealer. I have heard that there are some fairly
liberal dealers out there who will actually install the chip for you
and still honor the warranty. Then, there are the dealers who will
void your warranty for adding an aftermarket stereo. As in, if you
have a suspension problem, they will disallow that as a warranty
repair.
You could hire a lawyer and force them to pay for the repair (as
clearly, the stereo could not have possibly caused any suspension
hassle) but the burden is on you to jump through the hoops to prove
them wrong.
The turbo car is cheaper in inital aquisition, cheaper to run (less
thirsty when off-boost) and has more performance potential AFTER the
warranty has run out. Then you can fiddle with the motor all you
want, and not worry about voiding the powertrain warranty. Before the
warranty runs out, find a dealer that's friendly to chip-tuning, and
you're totally golden.
--
Jonesy
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??
On 30 Apr 2004 09:15:48 -0700, beelzebubba@hotmail.com (Jonesy) wrote:
>Cam Newton (ccnewto@hotmail.com) wrote in message news:<4091697d.18537535@news.gv.shawcable.net>...
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:56 -0400, "AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
>> >1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
>> >acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
>> >
>> >Try both and judge for yourself.........
>> >
>> >My $0.02
>>
>> I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
>> blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
>> computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
>> get 3l.
>>
>
>
>It has been mentioned before that a chip *could* void a warranty. It
>depends on the dealer. I have heard that there are some fairly
>liberal dealers out there who will actually install the chip for you
>and still honor the warranty. Then, there are the dealers who will
>void your warranty for adding an aftermarket stereo. As in, if you
>have a suspension problem, they will disallow that as a warranty
>repair.
>
>You could hire a lawyer and force them to pay for the repair (as
>clearly, the stereo could not have possibly caused any suspension
>hassle) but the burden is on you to jump through the hoops to prove
>them wrong.
>
>The turbo car is cheaper in inital aquisition, cheaper to run (less
>thirsty when off-boost) and has more performance potential AFTER the
>warranty has run out. Then you can fiddle with the motor all you
>want, and not worry about voiding the powertrain warranty. Before the
>warranty runs out, find a dealer that's friendly to chip-tuning, and
>you're totally golden.
>--
>Jonesy
I think honouring the warranty is up to the manufacturer. My dealer
told me they could chip my car but I doubt that I would do it at any
time; I am pretty much a stock guy and don't want to fiddle with the
thing. And since I have blown my wad on the A4, which I am loving (the
ride to work seems to be cut in 1/2 and everybody is going sooo
slooow) and am reluctant to do much more than keep it well supplied
with liquids for now and new parts, in about 4 years.
Did I mention how much I love the car? I am not one for affection for
objects but geez, it is a sweet ride.
>Cam Newton (ccnewto@hotmail.com) wrote in message news:<4091697d.18537535@news.gv.shawcable.net>...
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:56 -0400, "AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I can honostly say that if he does buy the A4 for the fun factor, a chipped
>> >1.8T will be a far better choice. Better response in handling and
>> >acceleration. Granted not as smooth as the V6 , but definately more fun.
>> >
>> >Try both and judge for yourself.........
>> >
>> >My $0.02
>>
>> I was at the Audi dealer and he said that a chipped car came in that
>> blew the computer. The car in question, not mine, needs a new
>> computer. The chip negates the warranty. Rather than chipping at 1.8T
>> get 3l.
>>
>
>
>It has been mentioned before that a chip *could* void a warranty. It
>depends on the dealer. I have heard that there are some fairly
>liberal dealers out there who will actually install the chip for you
>and still honor the warranty. Then, there are the dealers who will
>void your warranty for adding an aftermarket stereo. As in, if you
>have a suspension problem, they will disallow that as a warranty
>repair.
>
>You could hire a lawyer and force them to pay for the repair (as
>clearly, the stereo could not have possibly caused any suspension
>hassle) but the burden is on you to jump through the hoops to prove
>them wrong.
>
>The turbo car is cheaper in inital aquisition, cheaper to run (less
>thirsty when off-boost) and has more performance potential AFTER the
>warranty has run out. Then you can fiddle with the motor all you
>want, and not worry about voiding the powertrain warranty. Before the
>warranty runs out, find a dealer that's friendly to chip-tuning, and
>you're totally golden.
>--
>Jonesy
I think honouring the warranty is up to the manufacturer. My dealer
told me they could chip my car but I doubt that I would do it at any
time; I am pretty much a stock guy and don't want to fiddle with the
thing. And since I have blown my wad on the A4, which I am loving (the
ride to work seems to be cut in 1/2 and everybody is going sooo
slooow) and am reluctant to do much more than keep it well supplied
with liquids for now and new parts, in about 4 years.
Did I mention how much I love the car? I am not one for affection for
objects but geez, it is a sweet ride.
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
> > '80q'
>
> A car that my sister-in-law owns.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sp...gle.com&rnum=1
When I say that you were tripping in your own lies. Better believe me.
>
> A car that my sister-in-law owns.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sp...gle.com&rnum=1
When I say that you were tripping in your own lies. Better believe me.
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??
"AfourQ" <AfourQ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c6js6e$317$1@dns3.cae.ca...
> I gotto agree with the sound factor...6's do sounds sweet.
> A great 4 not matching a good V6 though??? in terms of what, cause a
chipped
> 1.8T will always outperform the 3.0L V6, with better fuel efficiency.
>
> It is all about what he is looking for.
>
> BMW uses flat 6's to get great torque figures.
>
> It is like comparing the 2.7T to the 4.2L V8 in the S4.
> A chipped 2.7T will always outrun the V8 (by the way, the 2.7T stock is
just
> as fast as the 4.2L V8 in the S4)
>
no they use the I-6 because it's perfectly balanced.. how can it be one is
a 6 spd manual and the other is a 5 spd auto??
news:c6js6e$317$1@dns3.cae.ca...
> I gotto agree with the sound factor...6's do sounds sweet.
> A great 4 not matching a good V6 though??? in terms of what, cause a
chipped
> 1.8T will always outperform the 3.0L V6, with better fuel efficiency.
>
> It is all about what he is looking for.
>
> BMW uses flat 6's to get great torque figures.
>
> It is like comparing the 2.7T to the 4.2L V8 in the S4.
> A chipped 2.7T will always outrun the V8 (by the way, the 2.7T stock is
just
> as fast as the 4.2L V8 in the S4)
>
no they use the I-6 because it's perfectly balanced.. how can it be one is
a 6 spd manual and the other is a 5 spd auto??
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
"Saintor" <saintor1@REMOVETHIShotmail.com> wrote in message news:<nhBkc.58613$6V5.716303@weber.videotron.net>. ..
> > > '80q'
> >
> > A car that my sister-in-law owns.
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sp...gle.com&rnum=1
>
>
> When I say that you were tripping in your own lies. Better believe me.
Oooo, you caught me in a bad edit. Believe you? After I already
pointed out all your lies and distortions? Not everybody is as dumb
as you, dimwit.
But at least I am adult enough to admit that I made a mistake. Too
bad you aren't.
Don't you have some VW trolls to make? Maybe I should go over there
and point out all your troll behavior, every time you make a trollish
post?
Riddle me this, super-dooper Google user - find where any of the
headers match. Any of them. Then you have a case.
--
Jonesy
> > > '80q'
> >
> > A car that my sister-in-law owns.
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sp...gle.com&rnum=1
>
>
> When I say that you were tripping in your own lies. Better believe me.
Oooo, you caught me in a bad edit. Believe you? After I already
pointed out all your lies and distortions? Not everybody is as dumb
as you, dimwit.
But at least I am adult enough to admit that I made a mistake. Too
bad you aren't.
Don't you have some VW trolls to make? Maybe I should go over there
and point out all your troll behavior, every time you make a trollish
post?
Riddle me this, super-dooper Google user - find where any of the
headers match. Any of them. Then you have a case.
--
Jonesy
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Saintor goes fishing (was: Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro or 2004 Acura TL??)
It does not matter. At all. But thanks for the compliment, anyway.
> Riddle me this, super-dooper Google user - find where any of the
> headers match. Any of them. Then you have a case.
> --
> Jonesy
> Riddle me this, super-dooper Google user - find where any of the
> headers match. Any of them. Then you have a case.
> --
> Jonesy