A4 tyres
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:23:52 +0000, Glenn Richards
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:23:52 +0000, Glenn Richards
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 09:23:52 +0000, Glenn Richards
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
<glenn@squirrelsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
>Glenn Richards wrote:
>
>> this classic holiday feast.
>
>Actually no I didn't. I've seen a number of these, someone is forging
>posts from myself and a number of other posters to alt.autos.audi with a
>large amount of crossposting.
>
>Headers saved for reference...
That was a forged post by a USENET vandal known as "hipcrime". Dippy
hates USENET, and especially it hates news.admin.net-abuse.email, so
it wrote a piece of abuseware known as "newsagent" that allows it to
forge supercede posts and force follow-ups to flood NANAE with
thousands of "WTF" posts such as yours.
What to do about it is simple. First, look at the headers of a few
forged posts, and filter on the commonly identifiable elements. Lately
dipy's been abusing news servers in northern Europe. If you subscribe
to a service such as Supernews, the filtering is already done for you.
Second, if you feel you NUST reply to a dippyspew post, look very
carefully at where the post will be sent before you send it. This will
ensure that you don't accidentally pollute another group thus doing
dippy's vandalism for it. Third, now that you're immune to this id10t,
join in the defense by posting a message similar to this one whenever
you see a dippyspew in your newsgroup. The more people who know about
dippy, the less damage it can do.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cqmcqr$q5v$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> "Dan Koren" wrote
>
> > Your info is out of date.
>
> Oh gimme a break. I was just trying to make a point that the original
> poster who has a B6 A4 (I think) may want to consider a certain size
> which is OK by the manufacturer, in case he had any concerns.
>
>
> > That was true of pre-2003
> > A4's.
> >
> > All current (and 2003-2004)
> > A4's come with 17" rims.
>
> As an option, yes. 15" and 16" stock.
>
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/03/03a4sedan.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan1_8.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan3_0.pdf
>
>
You made my point exactly.
All the above links are to Audi's world site,
not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com.
Also note that the fact that a car will allow
a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
perform or handle well with that wheel.
dk
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cqmcqr$q5v$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> "Dan Koren" wrote
>
> > Your info is out of date.
>
> Oh gimme a break. I was just trying to make a point that the original
> poster who has a B6 A4 (I think) may want to consider a certain size
> which is OK by the manufacturer, in case he had any concerns.
>
>
> > That was true of pre-2003
> > A4's.
> >
> > All current (and 2003-2004)
> > A4's come with 17" rims.
>
> As an option, yes. 15" and 16" stock.
>
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/03/03a4sedan.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan1_8.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan3_0.pdf
>
>
You made my point exactly.
All the above links are to Audi's world site,
not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com.
Also note that the fact that a car will allow
a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
perform or handle well with that wheel.
dk
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cqmcqr$q5v$1@news.onet.pl...
>
> "Dan Koren" wrote
>
> > Your info is out of date.
>
> Oh gimme a break. I was just trying to make a point that the original
> poster who has a B6 A4 (I think) may want to consider a certain size
> which is OK by the manufacturer, in case he had any concerns.
>
>
> > That was true of pre-2003
> > A4's.
> >
> > All current (and 2003-2004)
> > A4's come with 17" rims.
>
> As an option, yes. 15" and 16" stock.
>
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/03/03a4sedan.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan1_8.pdf
> http://www.audiworld.com/model/a4/04/04a4sedan3_0.pdf
>
>
You made my point exactly.
All the above links are to Audi's world site,
not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com.
Also note that the fact that a car will allow
a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
perform or handle well with that wheel.
dk
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dan Koren"
> You made my point exactly.
>
> All the above links are to Audi's world site,
> not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com
Audiworld is a US-centered site and the specs they publish are for
US-based models. Besides, www.audiusa.com shows the same info: 16"
stock and 17" optional for 2004.
> Also note that the fact that a car will allow
> a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
> perform or handle well with that wheel.
That's true, but the definition of "handling" varies depending on the
individual. For some it's firm/crisp steering response; for others it's
ride comfort. We don't know what the original poster's priorities are.
If he wants the former, he should buy himself 19" rims with 235/35/19
tires. If he wants the latter - he should stick with what he has or
even downgrade to 15s.
Cheers,
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dan Koren"
> You made my point exactly.
>
> All the above links are to Audi's world site,
> not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com
Audiworld is a US-centered site and the specs they publish are for
US-based models. Besides, www.audiusa.com shows the same info: 16"
stock and 17" optional for 2004.
> Also note that the fact that a car will allow
> a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
> perform or handle well with that wheel.
That's true, but the definition of "handling" varies depending on the
individual. For some it's firm/crisp steering response; for others it's
ride comfort. We don't know what the original poster's priorities are.
If he wants the former, he should buy himself 19" rims with 235/35/19
tires. If he wants the latter - he should stick with what he has or
even downgrade to 15s.
Cheers,
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dan Koren"
> You made my point exactly.
>
> All the above links are to Audi's world site,
> not to the US site -- that is www.audiusa.com
Audiworld is a US-centered site and the specs they publish are for
US-based models. Besides, www.audiusa.com shows the same info: 16"
stock and 17" optional for 2004.
> Also note that the fact that a car will allow
> a certain rim/wheel size does not mean it will
> perform or handle well with that wheel.
That's true, but the definition of "handling" varies depending on the
individual. For some it's firm/crisp steering response; for others it's
ride comfort. We don't know what the original poster's priorities are.
If he wants the former, he should buy himself 19" rims with 235/35/19
tires. If he wants the latter - he should stick with what he has or
even downgrade to 15s.
Cheers,
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a
Pete wrote:
> Audiworld is a US-centered site and the specs they publish are for
> US-based models. Besides, www.audiusa.com shows the same info: 16"
> stock and 17" optional for 2004.
I'm based in the UK - stock wheels are 16".
>> Also note that the fact that a car will allow a certain rim/wheel
>> size does not mean it will perform or handle well with that wheel.
> That's true, but the definition of "handling" varies depending on the
> individual. For some it's firm/crisp steering response; for others
> it's ride comfort. We don't know what the original poster's
> priorities are. If he wants the former, he should buy himself 19"
> rims with 235/35/19 tires. If he wants the latter - he should stick
> with what he has or even downgrade to 15s.
Basically I want to be able to go round corners faster without the back
end starting to twitch. On a previous car (MkIII Fiesta) I upgraded
165/65R13s on steel rims to 185/50R14s on alloys, the difference was
quite remarkable. That car only had 60bhp-ish, and after the upgrade
didn't have enough power to slide round a corner!
The theory goes that the more rubber in contact with the tarmac the
better. As all the tyres on my A4 (2001 model) will need replacing in
about 5,000 miles, I wanted to know if it was possible to fit a 225/50
width tyre on the existing rims (currently 205/55). According to my
calculations, dropping to a 50 profile on the 225 will keep the sidewall
height, circumference etc the same, so the ride comfort (and the speedo
reading!) should stay the same, but with a bit more lateral grip round
corners.
--
Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735
Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/
IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation
> Audiworld is a US-centered site and the specs they publish are for
> US-based models. Besides, www.audiusa.com shows the same info: 16"
> stock and 17" optional for 2004.
I'm based in the UK - stock wheels are 16".
>> Also note that the fact that a car will allow a certain rim/wheel
>> size does not mean it will perform or handle well with that wheel.
> That's true, but the definition of "handling" varies depending on the
> individual. For some it's firm/crisp steering response; for others
> it's ride comfort. We don't know what the original poster's
> priorities are. If he wants the former, he should buy himself 19"
> rims with 235/35/19 tires. If he wants the latter - he should stick
> with what he has or even downgrade to 15s.
Basically I want to be able to go round corners faster without the back
end starting to twitch. On a previous car (MkIII Fiesta) I upgraded
165/65R13s on steel rims to 185/50R14s on alloys, the difference was
quite remarkable. That car only had 60bhp-ish, and after the upgrade
didn't have enough power to slide round a corner!
The theory goes that the more rubber in contact with the tarmac the
better. As all the tyres on my A4 (2001 model) will need replacing in
about 5,000 miles, I wanted to know if it was possible to fit a 225/50
width tyre on the existing rims (currently 205/55). According to my
calculations, dropping to a 50 profile on the 225 will keep the sidewall
height, circumference etc the same, so the ride comfort (and the speedo
reading!) should stay the same, but with a bit more lateral grip round
corners.
--
Glenn Richards Tel: (01453) 845735
Squirrel Solutions http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/
IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation


