2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
07-05-2004, 05:44 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8 in
each application, and not the L on the A8.
Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
I'm currently bidding on an S8 on Ebay, to replace my S Class Mercedes, but
I notice I could have a year newer A8, or a 2005 A6, all for about the same
price.
each application, and not the L on the A8.
Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
I'm currently bidding on an S8 on Ebay, to replace my S Class Mercedes, but
I notice I could have a year newer A8, or a 2005 A6, all for about the same
price.
07-06-2004, 12:37 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
Viper wrote:
> All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8 in
> each application, and not the L on the A8.
>
> Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
so cool in _Ronin_.
In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
--
Mike Smith
> All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8 in
> each application, and not the L on the A8.
>
> Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
so cool in _Ronin_.
In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
--
Mike Smith
07-06-2004, 12:37 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
Viper wrote:
> All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8 in
> each application, and not the L on the A8.
>
> Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
so cool in _Ronin_.
In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
--
Mike Smith
> All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8 in
> each application, and not the L on the A8.
>
> Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
so cool in _Ronin_.
In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
--
Mike Smith
07-06-2004, 09:43 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
in
> > each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >
> > Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>
> If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> so cool in _Ronin_.
>
> In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> --
> Mike Smith
Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
And I agree about Ronin. I've seen it several times, the last time just to
watch the S8.
07-06-2004, 09:43 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
in
> > each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >
> > Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>
> If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> so cool in _Ronin_.
>
> In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> --
> Mike Smith
Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
And I agree about Ronin. I've seen it several times, the last time just to
watch the S8.
07-07-2004, 08:59 AM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
Viper wrote:
> "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
>
>>Viper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
>
> in
>
>>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
>>>
>>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>>
>>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
>>so cool in _Ronin_.
>>
>>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
enough".
--
Mike Smith
> "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
>
>>Viper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
>
> in
>
>>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
>>>
>>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>>
>>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
>>so cool in _Ronin_.
>>
>>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
enough".
--
Mike Smith
07-07-2004, 08:59 AM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
Viper wrote:
> "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
>
>>Viper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
>
> in
>
>>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
>>>
>>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>>
>>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
>>so cool in _Ronin_.
>>
>>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
enough".
--
Mike Smith
> "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
>
>>Viper wrote:
>>
>>
>>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2 V-8
>
> in
>
>>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
>>>
>>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
>>
>>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
>>so cool in _Ronin_.
>>
>>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
>
> Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
enough".
--
Mike Smith
07-07-2004, 01:48 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
I have actually seen a couple of new 2005 A6's while test driving an S8 at
the dealer. A few reasons a new A6 4.2 might be desirable over the old S8:
1) Nearly the same horsepower ( 330 vs.. 360 ) and less weight. Also has
chain driven camshafts rather than timing belts. Eliminates or minimizes
expensive maintenance.
2) Vastly improved navigation system, integrated into the MMI in the center
dash. A nice 7" color screen, and DVD-based rather than CD-based. The old S8
nav system is a PITA to use, and it has no screen at all, just arrows in the
auto-check window.
3) And, of course, less mileage! Longer warranty period ( 4yr/50K miles ).
The A6 impresses me as a larger, more luxurious, and better equipped car
than its predecessor, and it even has a larger trunk than the S8. I asked
the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
trunk, and the integrated phone is detachable from the armrest to function
as a portable cell phone.
Gee! I guess I've sold myself.....
--
Stephen Clark
89 Audi 100
99 Lexus RX300
Houston, Texas USA
See my Audi in the Registry at www.audiworld.com!
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10eo0eip5ccgpab@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> > news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> >
> >>Viper wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2
V-8
> >
> > in
> >
> >>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >>>
> >>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
> >>
> >>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> >>so cool in _Ronin_.
> >>
> >>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
> >
> > Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
>
> You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
> the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
> older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
> enough".
>
> --
> Mike Smith
the dealer. A few reasons a new A6 4.2 might be desirable over the old S8:
1) Nearly the same horsepower ( 330 vs.. 360 ) and less weight. Also has
chain driven camshafts rather than timing belts. Eliminates or minimizes
expensive maintenance.
2) Vastly improved navigation system, integrated into the MMI in the center
dash. A nice 7" color screen, and DVD-based rather than CD-based. The old S8
nav system is a PITA to use, and it has no screen at all, just arrows in the
auto-check window.
3) And, of course, less mileage! Longer warranty period ( 4yr/50K miles ).
The A6 impresses me as a larger, more luxurious, and better equipped car
than its predecessor, and it even has a larger trunk than the S8. I asked
the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
trunk, and the integrated phone is detachable from the armrest to function
as a portable cell phone.
Gee! I guess I've sold myself.....
--
Stephen Clark
89 Audi 100
99 Lexus RX300
Houston, Texas USA
See my Audi in the Registry at www.audiworld.com!
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10eo0eip5ccgpab@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> > news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> >
> >>Viper wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2
V-8
> >
> > in
> >
> >>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >>>
> >>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
> >>
> >>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> >>so cool in _Ronin_.
> >>
> >>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
> >
> > Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
>
> You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
> the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
> older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
> enough".
>
> --
> Mike Smith
07-07-2004, 01:48 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
I have actually seen a couple of new 2005 A6's while test driving an S8 at
the dealer. A few reasons a new A6 4.2 might be desirable over the old S8:
1) Nearly the same horsepower ( 330 vs.. 360 ) and less weight. Also has
chain driven camshafts rather than timing belts. Eliminates or minimizes
expensive maintenance.
2) Vastly improved navigation system, integrated into the MMI in the center
dash. A nice 7" color screen, and DVD-based rather than CD-based. The old S8
nav system is a PITA to use, and it has no screen at all, just arrows in the
auto-check window.
3) And, of course, less mileage! Longer warranty period ( 4yr/50K miles ).
The A6 impresses me as a larger, more luxurious, and better equipped car
than its predecessor, and it even has a larger trunk than the S8. I asked
the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
trunk, and the integrated phone is detachable from the armrest to function
as a portable cell phone.
Gee! I guess I've sold myself.....
--
Stephen Clark
89 Audi 100
99 Lexus RX300
Houston, Texas USA
See my Audi in the Registry at www.audiworld.com!
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10eo0eip5ccgpab@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> > news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> >
> >>Viper wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2
V-8
> >
> > in
> >
> >>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >>>
> >>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
> >>
> >>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> >>so cool in _Ronin_.
> >>
> >>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
> >
> > Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
>
> You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
> the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
> older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
> enough".
>
> --
> Mike Smith
the dealer. A few reasons a new A6 4.2 might be desirable over the old S8:
1) Nearly the same horsepower ( 330 vs.. 360 ) and less weight. Also has
chain driven camshafts rather than timing belts. Eliminates or minimizes
expensive maintenance.
2) Vastly improved navigation system, integrated into the MMI in the center
dash. A nice 7" color screen, and DVD-based rather than CD-based. The old S8
nav system is a PITA to use, and it has no screen at all, just arrows in the
auto-check window.
3) And, of course, less mileage! Longer warranty period ( 4yr/50K miles ).
The A6 impresses me as a larger, more luxurious, and better equipped car
than its predecessor, and it even has a larger trunk than the S8. I asked
the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
trunk, and the integrated phone is detachable from the armrest to function
as a portable cell phone.
Gee! I guess I've sold myself.....
--
Stephen Clark
89 Audi 100
99 Lexus RX300
Houston, Texas USA
See my Audi in the Registry at www.audiworld.com!
"Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
news:10eo0eip5ccgpab@news.supernews.com...
> Viper wrote:
>
> > "Mike Smith" <mike_UNDERSCORE_smith@acm.DOT.org> wrote in message
> > news:10elorg8nvon795@news.supernews.com...
> >
> >>Viper wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>All three of these seem to be about the same price, assuming the 4.2
V-8
> >
> > in
> >
> >>>each application, and not the L on the A8.
> >>>
> >>>Which of these three would you prefer to own, and why?
> >>
> >>If I didn't have to care about reality? I'd take the S8, 'cuz it looked
> >>so cool in _Ronin_.
> >>
> >>In the real world? I'd take an '05 A6 w/3.1 (they call it a 3.2).
> >
> > Why the new A 6 over the 2002 S8 for roughly the same price.
>
> You said you're looking at an A6 with V8, for the same price - I'd take
> the V6, for less money. I never thought I'd say this, but as I get
> older I've come to realize that yes, there *is* such a thing as "fast
> enough".
>
> --
> Mike Smith
07-07-2004, 04:17 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 A6 vs. 2002 S8 vs. 2003 A8 ?? Opinions
Stephen Clark wrote:
> the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
> the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
> old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
> sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
You're comparing to old A8 in this case? There isn't any S8 with new A8,
at least not yet. Anyway, if I would choose, I would take the new A8, it
just feels a bit more luxorious than A6. New A6 doesn't appeal me that
much, and A8's interiour is in my opinion looks like it has more quality.
Maybe this is the case also, since comparing the prices, A6 is a lot
better value. So if money means something, I'd go for the new A6.
- Yak
> the Porsche sales manager and the Audi sales manager why anyone would buy
> the A8, and they were speechless! The interior design is far superior to the
> old A6 or A8/S8. Sport seats are included that are very similar to the S8
> sport seats. The CD changer is in the glove compartment rather than the
You're comparing to old A8 in this case? There isn't any S8 with new A8,
at least not yet. Anyway, if I would choose, I would take the new A8, it
just feels a bit more luxorious than A6. New A6 doesn't appeal me that
much, and A8's interiour is in my opinion looks like it has more quality.
Maybe this is the case also, since comparing the prices, A6 is a lot
better value. So if money means something, I'd go for the new A6.
- Yak
