Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

Hamblin wrote:
> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do. Have
> you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and your oil
> level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there to warn you
> in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy loss of fluids,
> not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and again! Most
> remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.

Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and
have never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now on.


Bill T

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

Hamblin wrote:
> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do. Have
> you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and your oil
> level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there to warn you
> in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy loss of fluids,
> not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and again! Most
> remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.

Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and
have never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now on.


Bill T

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

Hamblin wrote:
> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do. Have
> you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and your oil
> level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there to warn you
> in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy loss of fluids,
> not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and again! Most
> remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.

Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and
have never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now on.


Bill T

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

"Bill T" <wctom1@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:44fe0cd3$0$19131$88260bb3@news.teranews.com.. .
> Hamblin wrote:
>> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do.
>> Have you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and
>> your oil level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there
>> to warn you in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy
>> loss of fluids, not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and
>> again! Most remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.
>
> Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and have
> never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
> frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now
> on.
>
>
> Bill T

I agree it is not a good idea to wait for the warning light before adding
oil - much better to keep it somewhere between min and max on dipstick.

I check mine every 1000 miles now, and reset the trip counter each time so I
know the distance i've travelled.

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

"Bill T" <wctom1@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:44fe0cd3$0$19131$88260bb3@news.teranews.com.. .
> Hamblin wrote:
>> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do.
>> Have you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and
>> your oil level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there
>> to warn you in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy
>> loss of fluids, not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and
>> again! Most remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.
>
> Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and have
> never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
> frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now
> on.
>
>
> Bill T

I agree it is not a good idea to wait for the warning light before adding
oil - much better to keep it somewhere between min and max on dipstick.

I check mine every 1000 miles now, and reset the trip counter each time so I
know the distance i've travelled.

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

"Bill T" <wctom1@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:44fe0cd3$0$19131$88260bb3@news.teranews.com.. .
> Hamblin wrote:
>> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do.
>> Have you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and
>> your oil level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there
>> to warn you in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy
>> loss of fluids, not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and
>> again! Most remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.
>
> Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and have
> never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
> frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now
> on.
>
>
> Bill T

I agree it is not a good idea to wait for the warning light before adding
oil - much better to keep it somewhere between min and max on dipstick.

I check mine every 1000 miles now, and reset the trip counter each time so I
know the distance i've travelled.

Re: 2.0 FSI oil usage
 

"Bill T" <wctom1@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:44fe0cd3$0$19131$88260bb3@news.teranews.com.. .
> Hamblin wrote:
>> I love the discipline of the underbonnet checks that you obviously do.
>> Have you ever considered what would happen if the alarm malfunctions and
>> your oil level disappears to a critical level or below. Alarms are there
>> to warn you in the case of an unexpected occurrence i.e. sudden heavy
>> loss of fluids, not as an alternative to lifting the bonnet every now and
>> again! Most remiss, chances are it will cost you heavily at some point.
>
> Well, until this car, I've checked the oil every 5000 miles or so and have
> never found the oil to be low. Obviously, my new car requires more
> frequent checks, and I guess I should plan on every 1500 miles from now
> on.
>
>
> Bill T

I agree it is not a good idea to wait for the warning light before adding
oil - much better to keep it somewhere between min and max on dipstick.

I check mine every 1000 miles now, and reset the trip counter each time so I
know the distance i've travelled.