2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
#11
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
I just do not get it why introduce the 'big' engine and then 'discontinue' it after 2 years. Give the people more choices....
#12
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barrie, Ontario
Posts: 287
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
Hi Alex, You are saying that you think the 2.0 will outsell the 3.2 by 2 to 1. Why is Audi Canada introducing the 3.2 first and not the 2.0? I asked this question at an Audi Event one of the Audi Mktg. Managers and the answer was that North American consumers still like the big engine for this type of car. Now, I bought the 3.2 because I could not wait any longer but I would have chosen the 2.0 without question. I see the statistics in Germany, the 2.0 and 2.0TDI are the preferred engines.
I just do not get it why introduce the 'big' engine and then 'discontinue' it after 2 years. Give the people more choices....
I just do not get it why introduce the 'big' engine and then 'discontinue' it after 2 years. Give the people more choices....
#13
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
#14
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barrie, Ontario
Posts: 287
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
#15
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barrie, Ontario
Posts: 287
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
Big engine doesn't necessarily mean higher gas consumption. For example BMW has a 3.5 Liter twin turbo engine that consumes less gas than Audi's 2.0t. It's all about engine's efficiency and power utilization.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
Big engine does not equal high consumption similarly, small engine doesn't mean lower consumption.
#16
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
I just don't like the idea of folks associated big engines with high consumption. That may have been the case 5 or 10 years a go but it's no longer. Same thing in reverse, small engine doesn't necessarily mean low consumption.
We need someone who has actually taken deliver of a 2011 Q5 2.0T to reset their computer and give us a proper reading taking into account their driving conditions/style.
#17
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
Well im from europe and THE main reason why ppl buy the 2.0 and not the 3.2 is that it costs 10000 euro more... But everyone loves the 3.2...
On the Europe market the 2.0 was first.. THAN the 3.2 came..
On the Europe market the 2.0 was first.. THAN the 3.2 came..
#19
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
My final words on this I am originally from Germany and live now in Canada. The price might be one reason why the 2.0 engines are more popular in Europe but I personally believe they are more popular because they are simply enough! They are enough for the curved roads and city traffic. I wish Audi and other car makes would offer their customers more choices!
#20
Re: 2.0T vs 3.2 fuel consumption
The 2.0T can and will be modified to its full potential soon enough, I am sure you can take an A4 turbo and stick it on there with minor modifications unless the whole entire engine design has changed.
As far as Europe VS North America i would say it essentially comes down to HP VS Torque. Europe Likes the HP and N.America has always loved the torque. Now before you say us N.Americans love the HP too, look at the bigger picture and ask your self why do we make so many 5.7,5.9.6.2L Engines??? Bigger engines provide a lot of potential for torque on the lower end which suits most N.American lifestyles. How many Europeans own a large boat or a trailer home/RV? Quite honestly next to none, and if it is a boat its already on the sea or lake.
So it will Always and I repeat always be a battle between Stigs fat American cousin or the Stig himself.
If some of you disagree that N.Americans like it bigger next time go to a McDonalds and supersize your fries and drink, that super size in Europe is at most a smaller cup than a medium drink and a small packet of fries. These guys like it compact and efficient, full of energy and not artificially inflated like the domestic engines.
As far as Europe VS North America i would say it essentially comes down to HP VS Torque. Europe Likes the HP and N.America has always loved the torque. Now before you say us N.Americans love the HP too, look at the bigger picture and ask your self why do we make so many 5.7,5.9.6.2L Engines??? Bigger engines provide a lot of potential for torque on the lower end which suits most N.American lifestyles. How many Europeans own a large boat or a trailer home/RV? Quite honestly next to none, and if it is a boat its already on the sea or lake.
So it will Always and I repeat always be a battle between Stigs fat American cousin or the Stig himself.
If some of you disagree that N.Americans like it bigger next time go to a McDonalds and supersize your fries and drink, that super size in Europe is at most a smaller cup than a medium drink and a small packet of fries. These guys like it compact and efficient, full of energy and not artificially inflated like the domestic engines.