REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
<mike1c@easy.com> wrote in message
news:1160844811.244663.64940@f16g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
Hello
Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
"Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle -
copy of letter below.
The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
Whilst a full refund would be fantastic, I am realistic and don't
really expect as I've had benefit from the vehicle (although not 100%
what I was expecting). What kind of compensation do you think is
realistic or should I expect Audi/the dealer to just refer to the
warranty that has covered the cost of fixing these problems?
Thanks for your thoughts!
MC
"Dear Sirs
After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
Goods Act 1979.
Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
Chassis Number: removed
Registration: removed
- Steering Column Replaced
- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
- Storage Hood Replaced
- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
- Air Conditioning Faulty
- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
- Airbag Wiring Replaced
- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
- Windscreen Frame Faulty
- Ignition Coil Replaced
My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
is appreciated.
Yours Sincerely"
I understood once you accept the first repair any thoughts of refund/return
go out of the window.
anyway as someone else pointed out you should now have a superb
car..........so SELL it quick.
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
<mike1c@easy.com> wrote in message
news:1160844811.244663.64940@f16g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
Hello
Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
"Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle -
copy of letter below.
The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
Whilst a full refund would be fantastic, I am realistic and don't
really expect as I've had benefit from the vehicle (although not 100%
what I was expecting). What kind of compensation do you think is
realistic or should I expect Audi/the dealer to just refer to the
warranty that has covered the cost of fixing these problems?
Thanks for your thoughts!
MC
"Dear Sirs
After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
Goods Act 1979.
Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
Chassis Number: removed
Registration: removed
- Steering Column Replaced
- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
- Storage Hood Replaced
- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
- Air Conditioning Faulty
- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
- Airbag Wiring Replaced
- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
- Windscreen Frame Faulty
- Ignition Coil Replaced
My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
is appreciated.
Yours Sincerely"
I understood once you accept the first repair any thoughts of refund/return
go out of the window.
anyway as someone else pointed out you should now have a superb
car..........so SELL it quick.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
<mike1c@easy.com> wrote in message
news:1160844811.244663.64940@f16g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
Hello
Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
"Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle -
copy of letter below.
The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
Whilst a full refund would be fantastic, I am realistic and don't
really expect as I've had benefit from the vehicle (although not 100%
what I was expecting). What kind of compensation do you think is
realistic or should I expect Audi/the dealer to just refer to the
warranty that has covered the cost of fixing these problems?
Thanks for your thoughts!
MC
"Dear Sirs
After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
Goods Act 1979.
Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
Chassis Number: removed
Registration: removed
- Steering Column Replaced
- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
- Storage Hood Replaced
- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
- Air Conditioning Faulty
- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
- Airbag Wiring Replaced
- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
- Windscreen Frame Faulty
- Ignition Coil Replaced
My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
is appreciated.
Yours Sincerely"
I understood once you accept the first repair any thoughts of refund/return
go out of the window.
anyway as someone else pointed out you should now have a superb
car..........so SELL it quick.
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>
>> "Dear Sirs
>
>
> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>
> Tro
3. The Salutation
The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is also
used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the correct
salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to a
professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead of
Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>
>> "Dear Sirs
>
>
> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>
> Tro
3. The Salutation
The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is also
used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the correct
salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to a
professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead of
Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>
>> "Dear Sirs
>
>
> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>
> Tro
3. The Salutation
The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is also
used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the correct
salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to a
professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead of
Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
mike1c@easy.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk