I certainly don't anymore and that's all.

<gcmschemist@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:1113245485.143052.176850@l41g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> JP Roberts wrote:
>> Your insults only add to your status.
>
> With you?
>
> Who cares?
>
> E.P.
>

 

I certainly don't anymore and that's all.

<gcmschemist@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:1113245485.143052.176850@l41g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> JP Roberts wrote:
>> Your insults only add to your status.
>
> With you?
>
> Who cares?
>
> E.P.
>

 

On 11 Apr 2005 11:47:37 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:

>
>Andy Turner wrote:
>> On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >Oh, and hey - after a while of have a rude, lazy and selfish posting
>> >style, folks will just killfile you or ignore your posts. Thus
>making
>> >usenet sort of pointless for you. Good luck with that.
>>
>> I don't think I'd lose much sleep about losing the readership of the
>> sorts of braniacs that can't figure out more than one style of post
>> and who choose to killfile people rather than figure it out...
>
>Oh, I didn't say anything about not being *able* to figure it out.
>More like having a preference for easily-readable posts.

Please try to appreciate that saying that they're "easily-readable",
is *only* your opinion, your preference. Top-posters simply find
top-posting easily-readable. The truth is, they're *both* easily
readable and if you learn to embrace more than one style of post (as I
did many years ago, despite personally preferring a different style),
then you'll soon get the hang of it and not even notice the style, but
just read what people have to say - which is *surely* what we're all
here for.


>Still can't control the urge to post, hmmm?

?! Why is this a problem for you? Please don't tell me that you're
another last-word-in junkie...


andyt

 

On 11 Apr 2005 11:47:37 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:

>
>Andy Turner wrote:
>> On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >Oh, and hey - after a while of have a rude, lazy and selfish posting
>> >style, folks will just killfile you or ignore your posts. Thus
>making
>> >usenet sort of pointless for you. Good luck with that.
>>
>> I don't think I'd lose much sleep about losing the readership of the
>> sorts of braniacs that can't figure out more than one style of post
>> and who choose to killfile people rather than figure it out...
>
>Oh, I didn't say anything about not being *able* to figure it out.
>More like having a preference for easily-readable posts.

Please try to appreciate that saying that they're "easily-readable",
is *only* your opinion, your preference. Top-posters simply find
top-posting easily-readable. The truth is, they're *both* easily
readable and if you learn to embrace more than one style of post (as I
did many years ago, despite personally preferring a different style),
then you'll soon get the hang of it and not even notice the style, but
just read what people have to say - which is *surely* what we're all
here for.


>Still can't control the urge to post, hmmm?

?! Why is this a problem for you? Please don't tell me that you're
another last-word-in junkie...


andyt

 

On 11 Apr 2005 11:47:37 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:

>
>Andy Turner wrote:
>> On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >Oh, and hey - after a while of have a rude, lazy and selfish posting
>> >style, folks will just killfile you or ignore your posts. Thus
>making
>> >usenet sort of pointless for you. Good luck with that.
>>
>> I don't think I'd lose much sleep about losing the readership of the
>> sorts of braniacs that can't figure out more than one style of post
>> and who choose to killfile people rather than figure it out...
>
>Oh, I didn't say anything about not being *able* to figure it out.
>More like having a preference for easily-readable posts.

Please try to appreciate that saying that they're "easily-readable",
is *only* your opinion, your preference. Top-posters simply find
top-posting easily-readable. The truth is, they're *both* easily
readable and if you learn to embrace more than one style of post (as I
did many years ago, despite personally preferring a different style),
then you'll soon get the hang of it and not even notice the style, but
just read what people have to say - which is *surely* what we're all
here for.


>Still can't control the urge to post, hmmm?

?! Why is this a problem for you? Please don't tell me that you're
another last-word-in junkie...


andyt

 

On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:


>But pointing out poor grammer or speling *is* rude.

Was this an intentional gag to spell both grammar and spelling
incorrectly? Yes, I know he'll *say* it was....

Do you really find someone helping you with your spelling to be rude?
Don't you want to learn and get it right? I know I wouldn't mind.
There's no point pointing out a typo, but if I were to consistently
spell something wrong, I see no harm in pointing having it pointed
out.


andyt

 

On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:


>But pointing out poor grammer or speling *is* rude.

Was this an intentional gag to spell both grammar and spelling
incorrectly? Yes, I know he'll *say* it was....

Do you really find someone helping you with your spelling to be rude?
Don't you want to learn and get it right? I know I wouldn't mind.
There's no point pointing out a typo, but if I were to consistently
spell something wrong, I see no harm in pointing having it pointed
out.


andyt

 

On 11 Apr 2005 10:22:44 -0700, gcmschemist@gmail.com wrote:


>But pointing out poor grammer or speling *is* rude.

Was this an intentional gag to spell both grammar and spelling
incorrectly? Yes, I know he'll *say* it was....

Do you really find someone helping you with your spelling to be rude?
Don't you want to learn and get it right? I know I wouldn't mind.
There's no point pointing out a typo, but if I were to consistently
spell something wrong, I see no harm in pointing having it pointed
out.


andyt