Dust in steering column?
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bl1gi0$v6h$1@news.ya.com>...
> "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:73da2590.0309251718.1ec765e5@posting.google.c om...
> > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > > "C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > > news:a8a578a8.0309250851.1551de30@posting.google.c om...
> > > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:<bks3ja$esj$1@news.ya.com>...
> >
> > Top-posting corrected...
> >
> > > > > Mr Krieger, you've got a tremendous ability to steer out of the
> point
> being
> > > > > made, haven't you?
> > > >
> > > > Not to mention leaping tall buildings at a single bound; faster than
> > > > speeding bullets; more powerful than a locomotive, etc. Thank you.
> > > > >SK<
>
> > > > > Yours is a truly irrelevant answer-
> > > >
> > > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > >
> > > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
> > >
> >
> > In addition, the recipient must have a sense of humor. Regardless,
> > your perception of what is brilliant and what isn't makes no
> > implication on CRK's comments.
>
[top-posting corrected, again]
> Dear Mr Spiker,
Not "mister," and that's "Spider."
> Even when it comes to perception, there are finer levels and less fortunate
> ones, and as for that matter, you might be better off if you weren't wasting
> your time trying to flatter an attempt at mediocre literature coming from
> dear Müder Krieger and instead you were driving a new RS6, for example.
Whew. For a literature enthusiast, you sure know how to type a
run-on!
1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
Mr. Roberts?
2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> In
> this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters, too.
Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from gentlemen.
Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
Bravo!
> When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat this
> matter.
Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
than anyone elses'.
Spider
> "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:73da2590.0309251718.1ec765e5@posting.google.c om...
> > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > > "C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > > news:a8a578a8.0309250851.1551de30@posting.google.c om...
> > > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:<bks3ja$esj$1@news.ya.com>...
> >
> > Top-posting corrected...
> >
> > > > > Mr Krieger, you've got a tremendous ability to steer out of the
> point
> being
> > > > > made, haven't you?
> > > >
> > > > Not to mention leaping tall buildings at a single bound; faster than
> > > > speeding bullets; more powerful than a locomotive, etc. Thank you.
> > > > >SK<
>
> > > > > Yours is a truly irrelevant answer-
> > > >
> > > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > >
> > > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
> > >
> >
> > In addition, the recipient must have a sense of humor. Regardless,
> > your perception of what is brilliant and what isn't makes no
> > implication on CRK's comments.
>
[top-posting corrected, again]
> Dear Mr Spiker,
Not "mister," and that's "Spider."
> Even when it comes to perception, there are finer levels and less fortunate
> ones, and as for that matter, you might be better off if you weren't wasting
> your time trying to flatter an attempt at mediocre literature coming from
> dear Müder Krieger and instead you were driving a new RS6, for example.
Whew. For a literature enthusiast, you sure know how to type a
run-on!
1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
Mr. Roberts?
2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> In
> this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters, too.
Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from gentlemen.
Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
Bravo!
> When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat this
> matter.
Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
than anyone elses'.
Spider
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
No offence would have been taken if someone had bothered to answer my
question genuinely in the first place. I think we all have serious matters
to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is only
of a despicable nature.
As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer in
the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl1gi0$v6h$1@news.ya.com>...
> > "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > news:73da2590.0309251718.1ec765e5@posting.google.c om...
> > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > > > "C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > > > news:a8a578a8.0309250851.1551de30@posting.google.c om...
> > > > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:<bks3ja$esj$1@news.ya.com>...
> > >
> > > Top-posting corrected...
> > >
> > > > > > Mr Krieger, you've got a tremendous ability to steer out of the
> > point
> > being
> > > > > > made, haven't you?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not to mention leaping tall buildings at a single bound; faster
than
> > > > > speeding bullets; more powerful than a locomotive, etc. Thank
you.
> > > > > >SK<
> >
> > > > > > Yours is a truly irrelevant answer-
> > > > >
> > > > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > > >
> > > > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
> > > >
> > >
> > > In addition, the recipient must have a sense of humor. Regardless,
> > > your perception of what is brilliant and what isn't makes no
> > > implication on CRK's comments.
> >
> [top-posting corrected, again]
>
> > Dear Mr Spiker,
>
> Not "mister," and that's "Spider."
>
> > Even when it comes to perception, there are finer levels and less
fortunate
> > ones, and as for that matter, you might be better off if you weren't
wasting
> > your time trying to flatter an attempt at mediocre literature coming
from
> > dear Müder Krieger and instead you were driving a new RS6, for example.
>
> Whew. For a literature enthusiast, you sure know how to type a
> run-on!
>
> 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> Mr. Roberts?
>
> 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
>
> 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
>
> > In
> > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters,
too.
>
> Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
>
> > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
gentlemen.
>
> Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> Bravo!
>
> > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat
this
> > matter.
>
> Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> than anyone elses'.
>
> Spider
question genuinely in the first place. I think we all have serious matters
to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is only
of a despicable nature.
As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer in
the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl1gi0$v6h$1@news.ya.com>...
> > "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > news:73da2590.0309251718.1ec765e5@posting.google.c om...
> > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > > > "C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > > > news:a8a578a8.0309250851.1551de30@posting.google.c om...
> > > > > "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:<bks3ja$esj$1@news.ya.com>...
> > >
> > > Top-posting corrected...
> > >
> > > > > > Mr Krieger, you've got a tremendous ability to steer out of the
> > point
> > being
> > > > > > made, haven't you?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not to mention leaping tall buildings at a single bound; faster
than
> > > > > speeding bullets; more powerful than a locomotive, etc. Thank
you.
> > > > > >SK<
> >
> > > > > > Yours is a truly irrelevant answer-
> > > > >
> > > > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > > >
> > > > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
> > > >
> > >
> > > In addition, the recipient must have a sense of humor. Regardless,
> > > your perception of what is brilliant and what isn't makes no
> > > implication on CRK's comments.
> >
> [top-posting corrected, again]
>
> > Dear Mr Spiker,
>
> Not "mister," and that's "Spider."
>
> > Even when it comes to perception, there are finer levels and less
fortunate
> > ones, and as for that matter, you might be better off if you weren't
wasting
> > your time trying to flatter an attempt at mediocre literature coming
from
> > dear Müder Krieger and instead you were driving a new RS6, for example.
>
> Whew. For a literature enthusiast, you sure know how to type a
> run-on!
>
> 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> Mr. Roberts?
>
> 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
>
> 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
>
> > In
> > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters,
too.
>
> Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
>
> > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
gentlemen.
>
> Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> Bravo!
>
> > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat
this
> > matter.
>
> Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> than anyone elses'.
>
> Spider
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bl2416$ne7$1@news.ya.com>...
> "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
[snipped, top-posting corrected]
> >
> > 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> > funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> > serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> > Mr. Roberts?
> >
> > 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
> >
> > 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> >
> > > In
> > > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters,
> too.
> >
> > Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> > Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> >
> > > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
> gentlemen.
> >
> > Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> > Bravo!
> >
> > > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat
> this
> > > matter.
> >
> > Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> > your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> > offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> > than anyone elses'.
>
> No offence would have been taken if someone had bothered to answer my
> question genuinely in the first place.
You are just too precious. Sounds like you are much too delicate to
get out of the house. Please inform yourself of what the "alt" in
alt.autos.audi signifies.
> I think we all have serious matters
> to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is only
> of a despicable nature.
More hilarious irony. Your complaints about the form of the replies
is laughable when you yourself cannot even begin to follow USENET
etiquette. Make much ad hominem commentary, Mr. High-and-Mighty?
> As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer in
> the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
Ahh, here is where you show your confusion. Is this not a public
forum? Did you not post your question in this forum? Now, with your
newly-found knowledge about what "alt" means, put those two together.
There you go!
Spider
> "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
[snipped, top-posting corrected]
> >
> > 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> > funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> > serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> > Mr. Roberts?
> >
> > 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
> >
> > 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> >
> > > In
> > > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive matters,
> too.
> >
> > Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> > Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> >
> > > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
> gentlemen.
> >
> > Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> > Bravo!
> >
> > > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will treat
> this
> > > matter.
> >
> > Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> > your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> > offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> > than anyone elses'.
>
> No offence would have been taken if someone had bothered to answer my
> question genuinely in the first place.
You are just too precious. Sounds like you are much too delicate to
get out of the house. Please inform yourself of what the "alt" in
alt.autos.audi signifies.
> I think we all have serious matters
> to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is only
> of a despicable nature.
More hilarious irony. Your complaints about the form of the replies
is laughable when you yourself cannot even begin to follow USENET
etiquette. Make much ad hominem commentary, Mr. High-and-Mighty?
> As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer in
> the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
Ahh, here is where you show your confusion. Is this not a public
forum? Did you not post your question in this forum? Now, with your
newly-found knowledge about what "alt" means, put those two together.
There you go!
Spider
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
No ettiquette is necessary if people should be complaisant enough, which
places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
JP Roberts
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309270830.69218be1@posting.google.c om...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl2416$ne7$1@news.ya.com>...
> > "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
>
> [snipped, top-posting corrected]
>
> > >
> > > 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> > > funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> > > serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> > > Mr. Roberts?
> > >
> > > 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
> > >
> > > 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> > >
> > > > In
> > > > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive
matters,
> > too.
> > >
> > > Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> > > Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> > >
> > > > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
> > gentlemen.
> > >
> > > Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> > > Bravo!
> > >
> > > > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will
treat
> > this
> > > > matter.
> > >
> > > Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> > > your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> > > offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> > > than anyone elses'.
> >
> > No offence would have been taken if someone had bothered to answer my
> > question genuinely in the first place.
>
> You are just too precious. Sounds like you are much too delicate to
> get out of the house. Please inform yourself of what the "alt" in
> alt.autos.audi signifies.
>
> > I think we all have serious matters
> > to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is
only
> > of a despicable nature.
>
> More hilarious irony. Your complaints about the form of the replies
> is laughable when you yourself cannot even begin to follow USENET
> etiquette. Make much ad hominem commentary, Mr. High-and-Mighty?
>
> > As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer
in
> > the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
>
> Ahh, here is where you show your confusion. Is this not a public
> forum? Did you not post your question in this forum? Now, with your
> newly-found knowledge about what "alt" means, put those two together.
> There you go!
>
> Spider
places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
JP Roberts
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309270830.69218be1@posting.google.c om...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl2416$ne7$1@news.ya.com>...
> > "Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > news:73da2590.0309261030.7b6dedf7@posting.google.c om...
>
> [snipped, top-posting corrected]
>
> > >
> > > 1.) I wasn't attempting to flatter anyone. I thought it genuinely
> > > funny - something lacking in much of USENET. People are too darn
> > > serious, and they take themselves WAY too seriously. Ring any bells,
> > > Mr. Roberts?
> > >
> > > 2.) My time is mine to waste, but thank you for your concern.
> > >
> > > 3.) Your decided lack of sense of humor is amusing in and of itself.
> > >
> > > > In
> > > > this way, we could all devote our resources to more productive
matters,
> > too.
> > >
> > > Your concern over other peoples' resources is touching, but misplaced.
> > > Concern yourself with your own productivity, and leave it at that.
> > >
> > > > A sense of humour is never devoid of politeness if coming from
> > gentlemen.
> > >
> > > Ahh, you *are* a fan of literature, and that difficult device - irony.
> > > Bravo!
> > >
> > > > When it is, it becomes only childish mockery, which is how I will
treat
> > this
> > > > matter.
> > >
> > > Well, you can treat it in any way you desire. That doesn't mean that
> > > your treatment is accurate or meaningful. The fact that you take
> > > offense at the obvious humor says much more about your shortcomings
> > > than anyone elses'.
> >
> > No offence would have been taken if someone had bothered to answer my
> > question genuinely in the first place.
>
> You are just too precious. Sounds like you are much too delicate to
> get out of the house. Please inform yourself of what the "alt" in
> alt.autos.audi signifies.
>
> > I think we all have serious matters
> > to attend and while a sense of humour is always appreciated, mockery is
only
> > of a despicable nature.
>
> More hilarious irony. Your complaints about the form of the replies
> is laughable when you yourself cannot even begin to follow USENET
> etiquette. Make much ad hominem commentary, Mr. High-and-Mighty?
>
> > As for your own shortcomings, why don't you provide a practical answer
in
> > the first place instead of rejuicing in what is none of your business?
>
> Ahh, here is where you show your confusion. Is this not a public
> forum? Did you not post your question in this forum? Now, with your
> newly-found knowledge about what "alt" means, put those two together.
> There you go!
>
> Spider
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bl9ce7$t7c$1@news.ya.com>...
> No ettiquette is necessary if people should be complaisant enough
Wrong. Etttiquette is always required. Even for the lazy and ignorant.
> which
> places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
With the majority of polite people.
Spider
> No ettiquette is necessary if people should be complaisant enough
Wrong. Etttiquette is always required. Even for the lazy and ignorant.
> which
> places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
With the majority of polite people.
Spider
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> >
> > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > --
> > C.R. Krieger
> Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
Why, *thank you*!
Now, if you'd simply get a sense of humor, I could make a suggestion
that might solve your Audi's 'problem'.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Anybody wanna bet he's too proud to listen to me?)
> >
> > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > --
> > C.R. Krieger
> Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
Why, *thank you*!
Now, if you'd simply get a sense of humor, I could make a suggestion
that might solve your Audi's 'problem'.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Anybody wanna bet he's too proud to listen to me?)
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
When spelling etiquette as "etttiquette", you are living proof of what
you're saying when you state that the lazy and ignorant need etiquette, so
I'll take your word for it.
JP
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309300850.ce9d3d1@posting.google.co m...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl9ce7$t7c$1@news.ya.com>...
> > No ettiquette is necessary if people should be complaisant enough
>
> Wrong. Etttiquette is always required. Even for the lazy and ignorant.
>
>
> > which
> > places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
>
> With the majority of polite people.
>
> Spider
you're saying when you state that the lazy and ignorant need etiquette, so
I'll take your word for it.
JP
"Spider" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:73da2590.0309300850.ce9d3d1@posting.google.co m...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bl9ce7$t7c$1@news.ya.com>...
> > No ettiquette is necessary if people should be complaisant enough
>
> Wrong. Etttiquette is always required. Even for the lazy and ignorant.
>
>
> > which
> > places those who desperately need such protocol where they belong.
>
> With the majority of polite people.
>
> Spider
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
Sounds you're finally coming back to your good old senses, so I'm all
"ears".
JP
"C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:a8a578a8.0309301004.fdaa264@posting.google.co m...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > >
> > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > > --
> > > C.R. Krieger
>
> > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
>
> Why, *thank you*!
>
> Now, if you'd simply get a sense of humor, I could make a suggestion
> that might solve your Audi's 'problem'.
> --
> C.R. Krieger
> (Anybody wanna bet he's too proud to listen to me?)
"ears".
JP
"C.R. Krieger" <warp2_shadow@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:a8a578a8.0309301004.fdaa264@posting.google.co m...
> "JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<bkvogh$m4u$1@news.ya.com>...
> > >
> > > Satire is never irrelevant. Unwanted maybe ...
> > > --
> > > C.R. Krieger
>
> > Satire has to be of a brilliant nature not to be irrelevant.
>
> Why, *thank you*!
>
> Now, if you'd simply get a sense of humor, I could make a suggestion
> that might solve your Audi's 'problem'.
> --
> C.R. Krieger
> (Anybody wanna bet he's too proud to listen to me?)
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<blcqul$8ir$1@news.ya.com>...
> Sounds you're finally coming back to your good old senses, so I'm all
> "ears".
Several thoughts:
If it's a 'plastic-on-plastic' rub, try a little dry lubricant like
talc (fairly clean and disappears quickly) or graphite (dirtier, will
continue to show, but more likely to solve the problem).
If it's a noise down inside the column, you might have something in a
soft carrier surface (IIRC, they use nylon on metal - should be
noiseless) that would only be accessible by taking off the column
covers. That might be easy - it might be a PITA.
The ultimate solution might be located just above your heater
controls. Hit the 'On' switch and apply the 'Vol^' button liberally.
I've found this approach adequately addresses most annoying noises in
all my cars (except the loose 10mm bolt in my 535's RF power window
assembly last week).
Gutes Glück.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Good thing nobody took me up on the bet!)
> Sounds you're finally coming back to your good old senses, so I'm all
> "ears".
Several thoughts:
If it's a 'plastic-on-plastic' rub, try a little dry lubricant like
talc (fairly clean and disappears quickly) or graphite (dirtier, will
continue to show, but more likely to solve the problem).
If it's a noise down inside the column, you might have something in a
soft carrier surface (IIRC, they use nylon on metal - should be
noiseless) that would only be accessible by taking off the column
covers. That might be easy - it might be a PITA.
The ultimate solution might be located just above your heater
controls. Hit the 'On' switch and apply the 'Vol^' button liberally.
I've found this approach adequately addresses most annoying noises in
all my cars (except the loose 10mm bolt in my 535's RF power window
assembly last week).
Gutes Glück.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Good thing nobody took me up on the bet!)
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Dust in steering column?
"JP Roberts" <1234@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<blcm6i$p5q$1@news.ya.com>...
> When spelling etiquette as "etttiquette"
Earlier, I mispelled it in another way. But it's quite humorous for
you to try and give lessons on ettiquette. LOL.
> you are living proof of what
> you're saying when you state that the lazy and ignorant need etiquette, so
> I'll take your word for it.
Since I am neither lazy nor ignorant, your comments are meaningless.
Are you done shoving your feet in your mouth, or do you require
another serving? I did note that you have a fine sense for for
writing irony.
Spider
> When spelling etiquette as "etttiquette"
Earlier, I mispelled it in another way. But it's quite humorous for
you to try and give lessons on ettiquette. LOL.
> you are living proof of what
> you're saying when you state that the lazy and ignorant need etiquette, so
> I'll take your word for it.
Since I am neither lazy nor ignorant, your comments are meaningless.
Are you done shoving your feet in your mouth, or do you require
another serving? I did note that you have a fine sense for for
writing irony.
Spider