Bad Drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:26:49 -0400, Mike Smith
> <mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Keep your insults to yourself, .
>
>
> Tweeeet! Name calling. I win. Thank you for playing.
I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave LaCourse wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
> On 13 Jul 2005 05:28:47 -0700, "Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So Dave, you only had a hint of NJ drivers, assuming you took the NJ
>>Turnpike.... I learned to drive in Massachusetts and lived there for 15
>>years and thought THEY were bad until I moved to NJ.... They are the
>>WORST here, as you have a lot of people that really don't know how to
>>drive but do it fast anyways. And the more clapped-out the car is, the
>>faster they go. Talk about frusternation!
>
>
> I didn't take the NJ turnpike. I used I84 and I81 to avoid NY, NJ,
> MD, and DC. You are correct about Mass drivers, but they aren't as
> bad as VA or CT, and we won't even mention NY. d;o)
That's pretty amazing how you drove on I84 and I81, and yet managed to
avoid New York. I've never been able to pull that one off, myself.
--
Mike Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:16:04 -0400, Mike Smith
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:16:04 -0400, Mike Smith
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:16:04 -0400, Mike Smith
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)
<mikeUNDERSCOREsmith@acm.org> wrote:
>I believe you're the one who insulted me first. And if you consider it
>a "game", then you're no better than a troll anyway.
My, my. Mike has a temper. That's ok. I was young once myself. I
know how it is.
Be well. (And I mean that.)
Dave d;o)


