"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040618030546.29695.00000141@mb-m16.aol.com...
> >you're being far too kind...
>
> LOL, his lies are just the tip of the iceberg, we all know that. I'm not
sure
> if he honestly didn't know that MB has been building an S600 for several
years
> and was simply to lazy to check, or if he honestly believes that no such
model
> ever existed before 2004. Either way it's stupid.

if you knew anything about cars which I've shown over and over again this is
the first year 2003, 2004 model year for the x600 series, since it's now a
twin turbo V-12 so no they haven't been making this version for years, its
the first time. so again you're a liar and a fool, one day you'll learn to
use goggle or a car mag until then you'll be the fool of a.a.a., I'm sorry I
had to be the one to tell you, spouting drivel and having two dumbazzes
backing you up will not make you smart or know anything about cars, since
I've proven over and over again you know enough to fill a thimble with room
to add a grape to the mix.

 

"Steve Grauman" <oneactor1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040618030546.29695.00000141@mb-m16.aol.com...
> >you're being far too kind...
>
> LOL, his lies are just the tip of the iceberg, we all know that. I'm not
sure
> if he honestly didn't know that MB has been building an S600 for several
years
> and was simply to lazy to check, or if he honestly believes that no such
model
> ever existed before 2004. Either way it's stupid.

if you knew anything about cars which I've shown over and over again this is
the first year 2003, 2004 model year for the x600 series, since it's now a
twin turbo V-12 so no they haven't been making this version for years, its
the first time. so again you're a liar and a fool, one day you'll learn to
use goggle or a car mag until then you'll be the fool of a.a.a., I'm sorry I
had to be the one to tell you, spouting drivel and having two dumbazzes
backing you up will not make you smart or know anything about cars, since
I've proven over and over again you know enough to fill a thimble with room
to add a grape to the mix.

 

>this is
>the first year 2003, 2004 model year for the x600 series

No, MB has been building the S600 and SL600 since the mid-1990s and the CL600
since the late 1990s. MB de-bored the engine and added twin-turbos for 2004
model year S and SL models but the engine is based on the previous V-12. This
is similar to Audi's 2.7 litre bi-turbo V6 from the B5 S4 and A6 2.7T, which
was really just a de-bored 2.8 V6 with a turbo system added on. You can slither
around and make wild (FALSE) claims all you like, but I stated that I've ridden
in a couple of S600s, and that's true. We know you're oblivious to reailty
Ghee, you even argued that the C36 is no longer in production, even after I
linked you 3 times to MB's C36 sub-site. You'd probably get along much better
here if you quit lying.

>spouting drivel and having two dumbazzes
>backing you up will not make you smart or know anything about cars

Even if they were "dumbazzes" (your spelling makes the comment even more
absurd) I don't need anyone's backup to make my claims true. If you'd ever
bothered to visit MB's website or a local car dealer you'd have seen that the
model exists, and found that it has existed for years. Of course, none of this
changes the fact that your claims of MB's V12 being superior somehow to VW's
W12 were blatantly untrue.

 

>this is
>the first year 2003, 2004 model year for the x600 series

No, MB has been building the S600 and SL600 since the mid-1990s and the CL600
since the late 1990s. MB de-bored the engine and added twin-turbos for 2004
model year S and SL models but the engine is based on the previous V-12. This
is similar to Audi's 2.7 litre bi-turbo V6 from the B5 S4 and A6 2.7T, which
was really just a de-bored 2.8 V6 with a turbo system added on. You can slither
around and make wild (FALSE) claims all you like, but I stated that I've ridden
in a couple of S600s, and that's true. We know you're oblivious to reailty
Ghee, you even argued that the C36 is no longer in production, even after I
linked you 3 times to MB's C36 sub-site. You'd probably get along much better
here if you quit lying.

>spouting drivel and having two dumbazzes
>backing you up will not make you smart or know anything about cars

Even if they were "dumbazzes" (your spelling makes the comment even more
absurd) I don't need anyone's backup to make my claims true. If you'd ever
bothered to visit MB's website or a local car dealer you'd have seen that the
model exists, and found that it has existed for years. Of course, none of this
changes the fact that your claims of MB's V12 being superior somehow to VW's
W12 were blatantly untrue.

 

>no just since 98 before then it was the 560 or something else don't try and
>change you're reply now,

What!? If you knew how to properly break-down BMW's model names you'd realize
that a 560 would be a 5-series powered by a 6.0 litre engine. Such a model has
never existed! BMW started building a V12 powered 750 in the late 1980s and
carried the model out till' 2002. It's 2005 MY replacment is now called 760,
idicating a 7-series powered by a 6.0 litre V12. For reference, the old 750
shared it's engine with the 850. Of course, I'm sure you'll deny that an 850
ever existed. I'm so sick of you polluting the board with lies and drivel, I'm
ready to start looking for ways to have you banned from USENET.

 

>no just since 98 before then it was the 560 or something else don't try and
>change you're reply now,

What!? If you knew how to properly break-down BMW's model names you'd realize
that a 560 would be a 5-series powered by a 6.0 litre engine. Such a model has
never existed! BMW started building a V12 powered 750 in the late 1980s and
carried the model out till' 2002. It's 2005 MY replacment is now called 760,
idicating a 7-series powered by a 6.0 litre V12. For reference, the old 750
shared it's engine with the 850. Of course, I'm sure you'll deny that an 850
ever existed. I'm so sick of you polluting the board with lies and drivel, I'm
ready to start looking for ways to have you banned from USENET.

 

>also GM is starting
>to make more 60 and I-6s so I think that the 90 is not in vogue.

The ONLY I6 manufactured by GM for North America is the 4.2 litre motor in the
Trailblazer/Envoy/Ascender/Rainier. Get your straight.

 

>also GM is starting
>to make more 60 and I-6s so I think that the 90 is not in vogue.

The ONLY I6 manufactured by GM for North America is the 4.2 litre motor in the
Trailblazer/Envoy/Ascender/Rainier. Get your straight.

 

>he just said 2.8 so then were both correct dumazz, buy you won admission.

No, HE was correct. He was making reference to Audi's 90-degree V6 and you
misunderstood him, probably due to the fact that you know NOTHING.

 

>he just said 2.8 so then were both correct dumazz, buy you won admission.

No, HE was correct. He was making reference to Audi's 90-degree V6 and you
misunderstood him, probably due to the fact that you know NOTHING.