I was just looking at the perf graphs on APR site for both their Stage I ECU and their HPFP. It seems to me that at some RPMs, the potential gain of the Stage I is only there is you also have the upgraded pump - anybody know different? For ex, look at 4000 RPM: the ECU graph is saying that we can make roughly 225 HP, but the fuel pump graph is showing that a stock pump is only capable of supplying fuel for ~215 HP. Anyone have experience with the stock HPFP and the APR Stage I ECU upgrade? Have you experienced the "fuel cut" issue mentioned on the APR HPFP page?
PS..I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade here. ANY more power would be good, and I've also read that fuel economy gets even better than stock! I'm just trying to gather the facts.
I was just looking at the perf graphs on APR site for both their Stage I ECU and their HPFP. It seems to me that at some RPMs, the potential gain of the Stage I is only there is you also have the upgraded pump - anybody know different? For ex, look at 4000 RPM: the ECU graph is saying that we can make roughly 225 HP, but the fuel pump graph is showing that a stock pump is only capable of supplying fuel for ~215 HP. Anyone have experience with the stock HPFP and the APR Stage I ECU upgrade? Have you experienced the "fuel cut" issue mentioned on the APR HPFP page?
PS..I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade here. ANY more power would be good, and I've also read that fuel economy gets even better than stock! I'm just trying to gather the facts.
cheers,
Paul
I'm also interseted in the answere to this question