Q5 - Q7 For the Q5 and the new Q7

Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-06-2011, 09:50 AM
  #1  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
Thread Starter
 
audi_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8
audi_al is on a distinguished road
Default Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Apologies in advance if this topic exists already but I have some specific questions because I'm just confused by all the internet articles and I'm looking to purchase this month:

1. Has anyone experienced 2.0T turbo-lag issuestHN

2. Gas efficiency: For highway driving has anyone come close to the 3.2 or 2.0 numbers?

3. Where are the best deals available in the GTA, Oakville, Mississauga etc


Thanks
audi_al is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 11:14 AM
  #2  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A3
 
Cprg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: VancouverBC
Posts: 57
Cprg is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

There have been loads of comments on these items, among others—a search through this forum will give plenty of information—but this is what I know based on having my 2.0T for 6 weeks:

1. Minimal. General consensus seems to be the same. You will not avoid it completely driving anything with a turbo—that's just reality—but it has, in my experience, been minimized in this vehicle to the point that it is a non-issue: the 2.0T feels more responsive off the line than the naturally aspirated 3.2. I assume you were asking as a comparison between the two. Audi Drive Select adjustment of throttle response helps, if that is an option.

2. Yes. I am just coming out of my break-in period, but have experienced 7.5 - 8.5 highway range enough to be impressed. No complaints there, though City numbers are not nearly as happy at this point. Other wise-ones on this forum have indicated that awaiting the 5,000 km mark will give more accurate readings. Note that these are computer numbers.

3. I will leave this for knowledgable GTAers
Cprg is offline  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
 
AK-Q5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 20
AK-Q5 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Hello - I also looked at both options very closely and in the end went with the 3.2 with no regrets whatsoever! Smooth clean power, feels solid and not much difference in fuel economy overall. In my view, there was just no comparison between the two engines! My .002! Cheers!
AK-Q5 is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 06:58 AM
  #4  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A4
 
Adrena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 145
Adrena is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Originally Posted by AK-Q5
Hello - I also looked at both options very closely and in the end went with the 3.2 with no regrets whatsoever! Smooth clean power, feels solid and not much difference in fuel economy overall. In my view, there was just no comparison between the two engines! My .002! Cheers!
Dido - we picked the 3.2 as well and have no regrets. We love it. Plus we like the "sound" better.
Adrena is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 08:09 AM
  #5  
Audi Forum - Posts like an S4
 
flightmedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 209
flightmedic is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Originally Posted by Adrena
Dido - we picked the 3.2 as well and have no regrets. We love it. Plus we like the "sound" better.
Ditto.........love the 3.2. No regrets and have done alot of traveling both highway and city and fuel economy is no problem.
flightmedic is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 08:44 AM
  #6  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
Thread Starter
 
audi_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8
audi_al is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

Perfect. 3.2 it is!
audi_al is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A3
 
Madelinot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 60
Madelinot is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

I don't regret going with the 2.0T. It doesn't sound as "refined" as the V6, but in terms of feel and power, it's great. See: Q5 2.0T vs 3.2L Dyno Comparison - AudiWorld Forums
Madelinot is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:24 AM
  #8  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A1
 
Nemrac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maple
Posts: 26
Nemrac is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

I went with the 2.0 and do not regret my choice at all. The engine has all the power you need and the kicker is the fuel consumption. You'll be well ahead with the price of gas going up.
Nemrac is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 01:56 PM
  #9  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A3
 
Madelinot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 60
Madelinot is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

The day I picked up my 2.0T Q5, my wife and I went on a road trip. The trip had been planned for a while, it just happened that we recived the Q5 at the same time. Right off the showroom floor, we filled it up and I acheived 850+km on that 75l tank with some city driving. That's pretty impressive for a new vehicle.
Madelinot is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 07:04 PM
  #10  
Audi Forum - Posts like an A4
 
Adrena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 145
Adrena is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions

As for shopping in the GTA. Call around and you are bound to find one of them willing to give you a great deal. Check the "2011 Q5 deal" thread. There are many posts and some info about Toronto dealers. Happy hunting!
Adrena is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Q5: 3.2 vs 2.0T questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.