REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
mike1c@easy.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
mike1c@easy.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
> Hello
>
> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
> find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle
> - copy of letter below.
>
> The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
> owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
> exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
No.
While you have had a number of faults they are all fixed under warranty and
you've had it far too long.
--
Alex
"I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away"
www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>
>>> "Dear Sirs
>>
>>
>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>
>> Tro
>
> 3. The Salutation
> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to
> a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead
> of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
connected to it!
Alan
>
>
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>
>>> "Dear Sirs
>>
>>
>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>
>> Tro
>
> 3. The Salutation
> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to
> a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead
> of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
connected to it!
Alan
>
>
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>
>>> "Dear Sirs
>>
>>
>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>
>> Tro
>
> 3. The Salutation
> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig to
> a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.) instead
> of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
connected to it!
Alan
>
>
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6XbYg.29749$pa.24407@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
>> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Dear Sirs
>>>
>>>
>>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>>
>>> Tro
>>
>> 3. The Salutation
>> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
>> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
>> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
>> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
>> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig
>> to a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.)
>> instead of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
>
> I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
> connected to it!
>
> Alan
>
>>
>>
>
>
you had me in stitches with that one......................
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6XbYg.29749$pa.24407@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
>> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Dear Sirs
>>>
>>>
>>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>>
>>> Tro
>>
>> 3. The Salutation
>> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
>> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
>> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
>> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
>> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig
>> to a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.)
>> instead of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
>
> I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
> connected to it!
>
> Alan
>
>>
>>
>
>
you had me in stitches with that one......................
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
"Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6XbYg.29749$pa.24407@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Lez Pawl" <Lez@Pawlbtinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:-OCdnQLtmaqwuazYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Tro.Jan" <trojan@trojan.com> wrote in message
>> news:4531218b$1_1@x-privat.org...
>>> mike1c@easy.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Dear Sirs
>>>
>>>
>>> Your letter should have started "Dear Sir"
>>>
>>> Tro
>>
>> 3. The Salutation
>> The salutation is placed two spaces below the last line of the inside
>> address and flush with the left-hand margin. The proper salutation for a
>> letter written to a firm is Gentlemen followed by a colon. Dear Sirs is
>> also used. When you are writing to an individual within the firm, the
>> correct salutation is Dear Mr. - (or Mrs. or Miss). If you are writirig
>> to a professional man or woman, use his title (Dr., Professor, etc.)
>> instead of Mr. A colon always follows the salutation.
>
> I don't think I'd want my colon put on a letter, I'm far to closely
> connected to it!
>
> Alan
>
>>
>>
>
>
you had me in stitches with that one......................
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
In article <1160844811.244663.64940@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups. com>,
mike1c@easy.com writes
>"Dear Sirs
>
>After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
>2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
>perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
>£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
>
>With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
>catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
>for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
>Goods Act 1979.
>
>Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
>for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
>I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
>
>A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
>Chassis Number: removed
>Registration: removed
>
>- Steering Column Replaced
>- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
>- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
>- Storage Hood Replaced
>- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
>- Air Conditioning Faulty
>- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
>- Airbag Wiring Replaced
>- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
>- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
>- Windscreen Frame Faulty
>- Ignition Coil Replaced
>
>My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
>is appreciated.
>
>Yours Sincerely"
Dear Mr 1c
Thank you for your letter. Your refund cheque+interest is in the post.
[If Carlsberg ran the Audi Car Company...]
--
Mr X
If only all car companies were like Carlsberg...
mike1c@easy.com writes
>"Dear Sirs
>
>After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
>2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
>perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
>£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
>
>With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
>catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
>for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
>Goods Act 1979.
>
>Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
>for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
>I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
>
>A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
>Chassis Number: removed
>Registration: removed
>
>- Steering Column Replaced
>- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
>- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
>- Storage Hood Replaced
>- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
>- Air Conditioning Faulty
>- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
>- Airbag Wiring Replaced
>- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
>- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
>- Windscreen Frame Faulty
>- Ignition Coil Replaced
>
>My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
>is appreciated.
>
>Yours Sincerely"
Dear Mr 1c
Thank you for your letter. Your refund cheque+interest is in the post.
[If Carlsberg ran the Audi Car Company...]
--
Mr X
If only all car companies were like Carlsberg...
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?
In article <1160844811.244663.64940@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups. com>,
mike1c@easy.com writes
>"Dear Sirs
>
>After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
>2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
>perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
>£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
>
>With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
>catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
>for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
>Goods Act 1979.
>
>Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
>for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
>I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
>
>A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
>Chassis Number: removed
>Registration: removed
>
>- Steering Column Replaced
>- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
>- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
>- Storage Hood Replaced
>- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
>- Air Conditioning Faulty
>- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
>- Airbag Wiring Replaced
>- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
>- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
>- Windscreen Frame Faulty
>- Ignition Coil Replaced
>
>My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
>is appreciated.
>
>Yours Sincerely"
Dear Mr 1c
Thank you for your letter. Your refund cheque+interest is in the post.
[If Carlsberg ran the Audi Car Company...]
--
Mr X
If only all car companies were like Carlsberg...
mike1c@easy.com writes
>"Dear Sirs
>
>After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
>2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
>perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
>£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.
>
>With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
>catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
>for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
>Goods Act 1979.
>
>Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
>for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
>I now request refund compensation within 7 days.
>
>A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
>Chassis Number: removed
>Registration: removed
>
>- Steering Column Replaced
>- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
>- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
>- Storage Hood Replaced
>- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
>- Air Conditioning Faulty
>- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
>- Airbag Wiring Replaced
>- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
>- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
>- Windscreen Frame Faulty
>- Ignition Coil Replaced
>
>My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
>is appreciated.
>
>Yours Sincerely"
Dear Mr 1c
Thank you for your letter. Your refund cheque+interest is in the post.
[If Carlsberg ran the Audi Car Company...]
--
Mr X
If only all car companies were like Carlsberg...