Group 1 Automotive Boycott
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Group 1 Automotive Boycott
In effort to fight what we believe to be unfair sales and labor
practices as well as stand up for Hispanic women's right to work in
a company dominated by white males - Group 1 Automotive, Inc., we're
organizing a boycott of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Dealerships.
As we gear up for the launch, we are trying to collect as many horror
stories as possible from consumers and employees (most have been
ex-employees). If you have had a bad experience, like many others
we've found, at any of the Group 1 Automotive dealerships listed
below. Please submit your story to our website @
http://www.group1sucks.com/complaintsubmission.html.
Advantage BMW Clear Lake
BMW of Stratham
Bob Howard Acura
Bob Howard Chevrolet
Bob Howard Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Bob Howard Downtown Dodge
Bob Howard Downtown Ford
Bob Howard's Crown Auto World
Bohn Brothers Toyota
Casa Chevrolet
Casa Mitsubishi on the Westside
Dallas Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
David Michael Honda of Freehold
Don Bohn Buick, Pontiac, GMC
Don Bohn Dodge
Don Bohn Ford
Don Bohn Lincoln Mercury
Folsom Lake Kia
Folsom Lake Toyota
Fort Bend Toyota
Gene Messer Cadillac, Mitsubishi
Gene Messer Chrysler Jeep
Gene Messer Ford
Gene Messer Mazda of Amarillo
Gene Messer Toyota
Gulf Breeze Ford
Hassel BMW
Hassel Volvo Glen Cove
Hassel Volvo Huntington
Ira Dodge - Medford
Ira Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Ira Lexus
Ira Mazda
Ira Nissan of Tewksbury
Ira Toyota II
Ira Toyota III
Ira Toyota of Manchester
Jim Tidwell
Lexus of Clear Lake
Lotus of Clear Lake
Luby Chevrolet
Maxwell Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep
Maxwell Chrysler South
Maxwell Dodge
Maxwell Pontiac / GMC
Maxwell Town North - Nissan
Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills
Mike Smith Auto Plex
Mike Smith Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Miller Honda
Miller Infiniti
Miller Nissan
Rancho Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge
Rockwall Dodge
Rockwall Ford - Mercury
South Pointe Chevrolet
Sterling McCall Acura
Sterling McCall Honda
Sterling McCall Lexus
Sterling McCall Nissan
World Ford Pembroke Pines
World Ford Pensacola
World Ford Sandy Springs
World Ford Stone Mountain
World Lincoln/Mercury - Alpharetta
World Lincoln-Mercury Snellville
World Toyota
If you believe that there is no place in today's business world for
the unprofessional behavior described above, please visit our
http://www.group1sucks.com/boycott.html page to see how you can help.
Thank you in Advance!
www.group1sucks.com
practices as well as stand up for Hispanic women's right to work in
a company dominated by white males - Group 1 Automotive, Inc., we're
organizing a boycott of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Dealerships.
As we gear up for the launch, we are trying to collect as many horror
stories as possible from consumers and employees (most have been
ex-employees). If you have had a bad experience, like many others
we've found, at any of the Group 1 Automotive dealerships listed
below. Please submit your story to our website @
http://www.group1sucks.com/complaintsubmission.html.
Advantage BMW Clear Lake
BMW of Stratham
Bob Howard Acura
Bob Howard Chevrolet
Bob Howard Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Bob Howard Downtown Dodge
Bob Howard Downtown Ford
Bob Howard's Crown Auto World
Bohn Brothers Toyota
Casa Chevrolet
Casa Mitsubishi on the Westside
Dallas Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
David Michael Honda of Freehold
Don Bohn Buick, Pontiac, GMC
Don Bohn Dodge
Don Bohn Ford
Don Bohn Lincoln Mercury
Folsom Lake Kia
Folsom Lake Toyota
Fort Bend Toyota
Gene Messer Cadillac, Mitsubishi
Gene Messer Chrysler Jeep
Gene Messer Ford
Gene Messer Mazda of Amarillo
Gene Messer Toyota
Gulf Breeze Ford
Hassel BMW
Hassel Volvo Glen Cove
Hassel Volvo Huntington
Ira Dodge - Medford
Ira Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Ira Lexus
Ira Mazda
Ira Nissan of Tewksbury
Ira Toyota II
Ira Toyota III
Ira Toyota of Manchester
Jim Tidwell
Lexus of Clear Lake
Lotus of Clear Lake
Luby Chevrolet
Maxwell Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep
Maxwell Chrysler South
Maxwell Dodge
Maxwell Pontiac / GMC
Maxwell Town North - Nissan
Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills
Mike Smith Auto Plex
Mike Smith Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
Miller Honda
Miller Infiniti
Miller Nissan
Rancho Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge
Rockwall Dodge
Rockwall Ford - Mercury
South Pointe Chevrolet
Sterling McCall Acura
Sterling McCall Honda
Sterling McCall Lexus
Sterling McCall Nissan
World Ford Pembroke Pines
World Ford Pensacola
World Ford Sandy Springs
World Ford Stone Mountain
World Lincoln/Mercury - Alpharetta
World Lincoln-Mercury Snellville
World Toyota
If you believe that there is no place in today's business world for
the unprofessional behavior described above, please visit our
http://www.group1sucks.com/boycott.html page to see how you can help.
Thank you in Advance!
www.group1sucks.com
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If the
practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough, THEY'LL take
care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to drum up support
for your cause is likely only quixotic.
For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
applicant's ethnic heritage.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
employers use similar tactics:
http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
http://www.group1sucks.com
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
plexus_sdc@yahoo.com wrote:
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
plexus_sdc@yahoo.com wrote:
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Group 1 Automotive Boycott
plexus_sdc@yahoo.com wrote:
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?
> Notices of unfair sales/labor practices are best forwarded to the
> appropriate governmental agency (or agencies) for their action. If
> the practices are found to be unlawful, and egregious enough,
> THEY'LL take care of the perpetrator(s). Otherwise, attempting to
> drum up support for your cause is likely only quixotic.
>
> For what it's worth, I support the notion that *anyone* (not just a
> particular ethnic group) should have the opportunity to *seek*
> employment at any establishment. And, the employer should not be
> forced to accept a less-qualified applicant, regardless of the
> applicant's ethnic heritage.
gpisucks@yahoo.com wrote:
> I agree with your statement 100% but as I am sure that you are aware,
> that is not the situation in this case. I think that at times,
> employers use similar tactics:
>
> http://www.laborlawyers.com/FSL5CS/p...iptions359.asp
>
> http://www.group1sucks.com
To be sure, there are employers who are far from respectable. As well,
there are unions that are about as useful as breasts on a boar hog --
some have proven to be corrupt. In regard to this matter, the *only*
thing I am aware of regarding this is that you appear to be zealous in
collecting horror stories against *one* employer, involving *one*
ethnic group.
Since you agree with my statement 100%, you are then aware that what
you are attempting to do has no hope of succeeding. Therefore, you're
likely either being forced to do it, have some personal axe to grind,
or have some financial interest in this "cause". History says the
latter is most likely. I'd also bet that most lurkers to this thread
would feel the same. D'ya get the feeling you've been plonked?