1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
Thanks very much for the info, that was great. I will take it out for a
test drive tomorrow (all going well).
I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
wonder which is more realistic?, I noticed that the A6 you reference is a
Turbo, the one I'm looking at, is not, I presume this is not good (from a
fuel economy point of view, I heard turbos can improve fuel economy).
Again, thank you for your help - its much appreciated.
Stee
test drive tomorrow (all going well).
I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
wonder which is more realistic?, I noticed that the A6 you reference is a
Turbo, the one I'm looking at, is not, I presume this is not good (from a
fuel economy point of view, I heard turbos can improve fuel economy).
Again, thank you for your help - its much appreciated.
Stee
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
Thanks very much for the info, that was great. I will take it out for a
test drive tomorrow (all going well).
I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
wonder which is more realistic?, I noticed that the A6 you reference is a
Turbo, the one I'm looking at, is not, I presume this is not good (from a
fuel economy point of view, I heard turbos can improve fuel economy).
Again, thank you for your help - its much appreciated.
Stee
test drive tomorrow (all going well).
I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
wonder which is more realistic?, I noticed that the A6 you reference is a
Turbo, the one I'm looking at, is not, I presume this is not good (from a
fuel economy point of view, I heard turbos can improve fuel economy).
Again, thank you for your help - its much appreciated.
Stee
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the A6 you reference is a Turbo, the one I'm looking
> at, is not,
I hope that you'll find that it is a turbo. Audi stopped using the
non-turbo 1.8 engine in the A6 with the C4 model (in 1997, 1998 for the
Avant). I'm assuming that the car you're referring to is the (just)
outgoing C5 model (saloon in production 1997 - 2004, Avant 1998 - 2005).
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1999 A6 1.8 vs +/-2000 A4 1.6
In message <818191649a5a0c5a0696b8992fa7ab3e@localhost.talkab outautos.com>
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
"steeren" <steeren@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was supprised to see the differences "What Car" gave the to cars, I
> wonder which is more realistic?
All I would say is that I've achieved near to (or better than) the
official average with all three of my Audis. My current RS6 has an
official average of 19.8 - I currently get around 21.5. However, I
don't use my car for daily commuting (I work from home), and a lot of my
driving is long distance - the car rarely leaves the garage for less
than a 20 mile journey. Having said that, I don't tend to hang around.
--
Peter Bell (Note Spamtrap - To reply, replace 'invalid' with 'bellfamily')
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
For Sale: FS : 1999-2000 Front Brake Rotor
Audi2Go
Audi parts for sale & wanted.
7
09-17-2012 10:52 AM
spooling_at_23pounds
Audi Cars For Sale
0
04-26-2006 05:48 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)